Titlebook: Rationality, Rules, and Structure; Julian Nida-Rümelin,Wolfgang Spohn Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 intention.i

AORTA

钻孔

Structural Reasons in Rational Interaction,e structure of the decision situation and which, as it is argued, cannot be represented in these very preferences. It is outlined how game theory under a non-orthodox interpretation can be embedded in a conceptually enriched framework capable of accounting for structural reasons.

stroke

玷污

安定

Words and Deeds: A Focus Theory of Norms, that the claim that norms influence behavior is vindicated by the experimental results. To use social norms in an explanatory and predictive role, however, we need much more knowledge than we presently have about which situational cues focus our attention on which norms.

airborne

言行自由

Rationality: Coherence and Structure,e required to satisfy. This, however, does not involve a commitment to consequentialism..It can be rational to be polite. To behave politely requires to follow certain rules. A. Sen has shown that following these rules is incompatible with acting as a consequentialist. Sen proposes, therefore, to gi

Infinitesimal

The Rationality of Rules,o rules, both in the context of intrapersonal choosing over time, and interpersonal interactions. This can be traced to a basic presupposition that consequential reasoning must conform to a separability principle. There is a distinct approach that rejects separability, but renders the notion of a co

Calculus

Constitutions as External Constraints?,plied by human agents and since these have to be considered as rational themselves, it is not obvious whether external enforcement is possible at all and what its foundations might be. The problem is particularly conspicuous with respect to political constitutions. Two polar ideas may be discerned —

arbiter