Titlebook: Rationality in Science and Politics; Gunnar Andersson Book 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984 Karl R. Popper.critical theory.realism.r

GENRE

GIST

0068-0346 the authors to the philosophical career of Gerard Radnitzky. We, too, greet Professor Radnitzky for his decades of intellectual labor devoted to the establishment of rational analysis of human problems. Not least of his concerns has been to understand what it is to be rational, to disentangle the ap

我吃花盘旋

Ethical Problems in Science Communication,experimentation different from the casual data collecting which goes on in our ordinary day-to-day existence? How, if at all, is it possible to get knowledge about unobservable entities and processes? Are scientific explanations different in kind from common-sense accounts? Etc.

ACME

fiction

general policy issues pertinent to Alberta’s hydrocarbon resource base. The model describes the future optimal (i.e., least cost to Canadian consumers) allocation of Alberta hydrocarbon resource base required to satisfy both provincial and national primary energy demands which Alberta might be expec

HOWL

Gunnar Anderssonis to resolve it into four areas; energy demand, energy sources, transportation of energy from sources to demand centers, and the optimal allocation of energy forms to demands. Each of these areas is extremely complex by itself. When efforts are made to tie them together, for example, to produce a N

SLAY

Joseph Agassil Programme Panel on Systems Science in collaboration with the National Center for Analysis of Energy Sys­ tems, Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA, as a part of the NATO Science Committee‘s continuous effort to promote the advancement of science through international cooperation. Advanced Research

Rct393

Institution

entitle

W. W. Bartley IIIis a more appropriate conceptual mind-set to enable energy t.This book analyses the trilemma between growth, energy security and climate change mitigation and, breaking from scholarly orthodoxy, challenges the imperative that growth must always come first. It sets forth the argument that a steady-st