Titlebook: Questioning Cosmopolitanism; Stan Hooft,Wim Vandekerckhove Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Cosmopolitan freedom.Cosmop

radiograph

不在灌木丛中

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8704-1Cosmopolitan freedom; Cosmopolitan stranger; Cosmopolitan vision; Cosmopolitanism; Fetishism of identity

大暴雨

Stan Hooft,Wim VandekerckhoveContains the very latest in research on cosmopolitanism as a concept in political philosophy and in ethics.Presents the work of the world’s leading scholars in this field.Written in a style accessible

想象

CERE

Questioning Cosmopolitanism978-90-481-8704-1Series ISSN 1871-0409 Series E-ISSN 1871-1456

发起

Feasibility Constraints and the Cosmopolitan Vision: Empirical Reasons for Choosing Justice Over Hum make a conceptual clarification about the humanity approach before giving an argument for promoting justice as the foundation of cosmopolitanism, drawing on work in moral psychology, economics and experimental philosophy. In the final part of the paper I give some reasons for being cautious about the conclusion of the practical argument.

refraction

1871-0409 o advocate world peace through religious tolerance and a society of states. That same inspiration can be noted in the American and French revolutions. In the eighteenth century, enlig- enment philosophers such 978-94-007-1565-3978-90-481-8704-1Series ISSN 1871-0409 Series E-ISSN 1871-1456

讨人喜欢

abstemious

Moral Progress and World History: Ethics and Global Interconnectednessand to commit themselves to avoiding actions that would harm others. Even when those others are at great distances from us geographically, institutionally or historically, there is a disposition to care about them and to avoid harming them. The paper appeals to the tradition of David Hume and Adam S

Narcissist

Cosmopolitanism, Identity and Recognitionolitical thinking needs “a basic conceptual shift to the normative premises of a theory of recognition that locates the core of all experiences of injustice in the withdrawal of social recognition, in the phenomena of humiliation and disrespect”.. Honneth identifies three spheres of recognition in m