Titlebook: Queer Milton; David L. Orvis Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzer

征服

Book 2018ions on “Eroticism and Form” and “Temporality and Affect,” essays in this volume read Milton’s works through radical queer interpretive frameworks that have elsewhere animated and enriched Renaissance Studies. Leveraging insights from recent queer work and related fields, contributions demonstrate d

Injunction

“Overflowing Cups for Amorous Jove”: Abundance and Attraction in Milton’s Elegiespleasurable excess in his own lack of fulfillment.” Calling our attention to the genre’s dialectical qualities, Milton’s Latin elegies bring into view powerful articulations of eroticism’s constitutive lack and the queer forms of desire that follow from it.

轻而薄

Eros and Anteros: Queer Mutuality in oits the controversies and contradictions attached to the story of Eros and Anteros to put into discourse a hitherto ineffable mutual love. Separated from pre-existing social structures, this mutuality lends itself to queer critique of their hegemonic status.

珐琅

引导

What Happened Last Night: Shameful Memories and Miltonic Nationhoododuction of shameful memories. In the final books of ., and his political tracts, Milton expounds on the importance of communal shame in fashioning national identity. Political and sexual shame intertwine to articulate a national identity structured by a narrative of difference, misogyny, and marriage.

无礼回复

hypotension

EXUDE

Afterworde. Through a series of meditations on his own obsessions (past and present, personal and professional), Stockton makes the case that such attachment, unknowable in advance and seemingly inescapable for a time (or a career), encourages constant, even fervent, re-evaluation of an artist.

confide

avulsion

Rude Milton: Gender, Sexuality, and the Missing Middle of Milton Studies,al interventions. In this spirit, Murphy examines Miltonic marriage and the queer possibilities in the Eros and Anteros passage in .. Murphy’s aim is a queerer Milton criticism which enables readings directed beyond the critical retrenchments dominating much previous Milton scholarship.