Titlebook: Quantum Logic; Peter Mittelstaedt Book 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1978 Interpretation.logic.proposition.quantum

箴言

antidepressant

The Lattice of Effective Quantum Logic,bility and implicative sublattices and show that the lattice .. is a relaxation of the implicative lattice .. (Section 5.3). Finally, it will be shown that .. is also a relaxation of the orthocomplemented quasimodular lattice from which it differs by only the ‘tertium non datur’ law.

神化怪物

occult

Introduction,itions is established, which is slightly different from the calculus . of classical propositional logic but which is applicable to all quantum mechanical propositions (C.F. v. Weizsäcker, 1955). This calculus has sometimes been called ‘.’.

curriculum

Inscrutable

Concluding Remarks: Classical Logic and Quantum Logic,ons. In particular, propositions about physical systems have this property to the extent that the system in question can be considered as a classical one. Consequently, from this point of view classical propositional logic turns out to be an idealisation, which has only approximate validity and, thus, no fundamental meaning.

defibrillator

Book 1978at in quantum mechanics the most simple observables which correspond to yes-no propositions about a quantum physical system constitute an algebraic structure, the most important proper­ ties of which are given by an orthocomplemented and quasimodular lattice Lq. Furthermore, this lattice of quantum

arousal

0166-6991 statement that propositions about quantum physical systems are governed by the laws of quantum logic, which differ from ordinary classical logic and which are b978-94-009-9873-5978-94-009-9871-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

精密

The Calculus of Full Quantum Logic,e availability propositions is re-established, it follows that the principle of excluded middle which is valid for elementary propositions, is, in fact, inherited by all finitely compound propositions. In this way, the calculus . of full quantum logic can be justified (Section 6.4).

RUPT

Book 1978to all quantum mechanical propositions (C. F. v. Weizsacker, 1955). This calculus has sometimes been called ‘quan­ tum logic‘. However, the statement that propositions about quantum physical systems are governed by the laws of quantum logic, which differ from ordinary classical logic and which are b