找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse; Inquisitorial and Ad Grażyna Anna Bednarek Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P

[复制链接]
查看: 12142|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:29:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse
副标题Inquisitorial and Ad
编辑Grażyna Anna Bednarek
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse; Inquisitorial and Ad Grażyna Anna Bednarek Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P
描述Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse brings together the fields of discourse analysis and socio-legal studies to identify, illustrate and explain the cross-cultural similarities and disparities between the inquisitorial and adversarial procedures of witness examination in criminal trials.
出版日期Book 2014
关键词Civil Law; Common Law; criminal trial; witness examination; legal professions; applied linguistics; discou
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414250
isbn_softcover978-1-349-49018-9
isbn_ebook978-1-137-41425-0
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse网络公开度




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse被引频次




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse被引频次学科排名




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse年度引用




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse年度引用学科排名




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse读者反馈




书目名称Polish vs. American Courtroom Discourse读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:39:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:17:02 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,stic genre. What follows is a comparative analysis of Polish vs. American courtroom discourse, with particular attention to the inquisitorial and adversarial procedures of witness examination in criminal trials as two diverging ways of seeking the truth and pursuing justice within the common law and civil law.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:22:24 | 显示全部楼层
Explorations of Courtroom Discourse,the investigations of courtroom discourse. Finally, it demonstrates the general perspective of the research, explains the origin of the data, and justifies the methodology employed to investigate courtroom discourse.
发表于 2025-3-22 11:58:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:54:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:56:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:03:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:16:40 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414250Civil Law; Common Law; criminal trial; witness examination; legal professions; applied linguistics; discou
发表于 2025-3-23 08:47:03 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 23:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表