Titlebook: Oscar Wilde and the Cultures of Childhood; Joseph Bristow Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Fairy stories.Ado

放逐某人

Book 2017hful beauty, and his theological contemplation of what it means to be a child in the eyes of God. The collection also examines the ways in which Wilde’s works—not just his fairy stories—have been adapted for young audiences. 

漂亮

Book 2017ories, his life as a caring father to two small boys, his place as a defender of children’s rights within the prison system, his fascination with youthful beauty, and his theological contemplation of what it means to be a child in the eyes of God. The collection also examines the ways in which Wilde

originality

construct

,“Play[ing] Narcissus to a Photograph”: Oscar Wilde and the Image of the Child,photographic medium; and the presence of photographic metaphors in several of his fairy stories. The main argument is that Wilde’s fairy tales invite their readers to contemplate the child as an image formed by a relatively new technology of vision. Wilde, however, maintained a critical perspective

遗传

The Good Aesthetic Child and Deferred Aesthetic Education, fashion. This chapter questions whether aestheticism constituted an actual family subculture and whether aesthetes at home consciously pursued an agenda of teaching their children good taste. It situates Wilde’s sons amid similar aesthetic children in history and fiction. In his memoirs, Vyvyan Hol

RLS898

皮萨

,Oscar Wilde, Evelyn Sharp, and the Politics of Dress and Decoration in the Fin-de-Siècle Fairy Taleracters shaped public perception of the wearers’ gender. Through their examination of how clothes politicize the body—often in ways uncontrollable and devastating to the characters forced to adapt a specific aesthetic—Wilde and Sharp unite the fairy-tale genre with contemporary conversations about g

舰旗

MILK

Insulin

,The Young Know Everything: Oscar Wilde’s Fairy Tales as Children’s Literature,rature for children. Many commentators deny that they fit that category based on their perceptions of the tales’ complexity and their acceptance of common assumptions about the limited knowledge and ability of youngsters. Nodelman proposes instead to consider the tales in relation to his analysis in