找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Organic Public Engagement; How Ecological Think Adam S. Lerner,Pat J. Gehrke Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018

[复制链接]
楼主: Remodeling
发表于 2025-3-23 13:45:49 | 显示全部楼层
Generating Outcomes from Organic Engagement Events,e that studying public engagement events through grounded theory and multi-sited ethnography produces more ecologically valid results. Grounded theory provides the ability to develop theories for understudied phenomena and draw new conclusions on existing studies. Multi-sited ethnography ameliorates
发表于 2025-3-23 15:01:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 19:09:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 00:17:45 | 显示全部楼层
Ecological Thinking in Science and Public,. This chapter concludes by explaining how ecological validity and ecological thinking in general provide public engagement with science both concrete guidelines for better research and heuristics for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of competing engagement methods.
发表于 2025-3-24 05:55:23 | 显示全部楼层
Engaging Public Ecologies,ost popular, novel, and widely researched sites for understanding public engagement; however, these events usually utilize artificially constructed spaces of engagement and therefore studies that infer public opinions or beliefs from these events have weak ecological validity.
发表于 2025-3-24 10:04:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 11:11:38 | 显示全部楼层
Generating Outcomes from Organic Engagement Events,ook with a discussion of how the combination of multi-sited ethnography and grounded theory in the context of organic public engagement with science produces middle-range theories that are more robust and actionable than the insights generated by traditional models of artificial public engagement.
发表于 2025-3-24 18:21:30 | 显示全部楼层
Publics and Counterpublics of Engagement,l and philosophical discussions. We then turn to studies of publics, counterpublics, and vernacular rhetoric. Together these constitute a compelling case for a method of public engagement with science that engages actually existing publics as they communicate and deliberate “in the wild.”
发表于 2025-3-24 22:26:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 23:27:16 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2018ent grounded in ecological thinking. It offers engagement scholars an effective and efficient means of carrying out their missions, while simultaneously building a more ecologically valid method for studying actually existing publics. .
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 20:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表