找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Online Incivility and Public Debate; Nasty Talk Gina Masullo Chen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Incivility

[复制链接]
查看: 44554|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 17:48:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate
副标题Nasty Talk
编辑Gina Masullo Chen
视频video
概述Offers the first book-length study of incivility in computer-mediated interactions between members of the public, rather than newsmakers, politicians, or media pundits.Synthesizes the growing body of
图书封面Titlebook: Online Incivility and Public Debate; Nasty Talk Gina Masullo Chen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Incivility
描述.This book investigates what influence online incivility—through user-generated comments on news websites—has on public debate. Built on the premise that public discussions about important topics are vital to a healthy democracy, the book analyzes 3,508 online comments in order to understand what factors in comments make them more susceptible to incivility, defined as nasty remarks rife with profanity. It also examines comments for attributes of deliberation, which are discussions across difference supported by evidence and rational arguments. Using an experiment, the book shows that uncivil comments jumpstart a chain reaction, leading first to negative emotion and then to greater intention to get politically involved. Overall, .Online Incivility and Public Debate: Nasty Talk. argues that while incivility mars online debate, it may also spark interest in important topics and allow for positive “deliberative moments” of quality discussion..
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Incivility; Social Media; Deliberative Democracy; Digital Discourse; Online Commenting; profanity; news; po
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56273-5
isbn_softcover978-3-319-85872-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-56273-5
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate网络公开度




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate被引频次




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate被引频次学科排名




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate年度引用




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate年度引用学科排名




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate读者反馈




书目名称Online Incivility and Public Debate读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:55:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:34:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:08:03 | 显示全部楼层
Gina Masullo ChenOffers the first book-length study of incivility in computer-mediated interactions between members of the public, rather than newsmakers, politicians, or media pundits.Synthesizes the growing body of
发表于 2025-3-22 09:23:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:51:37 | 显示全部楼层
Online Incivility and Public Discoursethat deliberation—including online disagreement—is vital to the vigorous public debate that is a hallmark of a democratic society. It allows all people to take part in the discussions that may shape decision-making in society, rather than a mere few. I argue that this form of communication takes on
发表于 2025-3-22 17:54:22 | 显示全部楼层
Nasty Talk Online? I argue that a lack of civility in public debate is not new, but online communication is particularly suited to turning nasty because it is so public and messages can go viral in seconds. So even one uncivil comment can spark a chain reaction that gets many people enraged rather quickly. Therefore
发表于 2025-3-22 21:50:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:42:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:08:00 | 显示全部楼层
Incivility and Speaking Out negative emotional response that makes them more likely to speak out or get involved politically in an effort to “set the record straight” about the topic. In essence, the incivility mutes a natural drive to remain silent when confronted with views that oppose one’s own. This chapter theorizes this
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 05:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表