Titlebook: Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision; Dionysis Christias Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

trace-mineral

书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision网络公开度




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision被引频次




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision被引频次学科排名




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision年度引用




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision年度引用学科排名




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision读者反馈




书目名称Normativity, Lifeworld, and Science in Sellars’ Synoptic Vision读者反馈学科排名

prostatitis

Annotate

prosperity

978-3-031-27028-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl

Leaven

Dionysis ChristiasConsiders the relationship between Wilfrid Sellars‘ work,‘phenomenology, and speculative realism.Discusses Sellars’ concept of the stereoscopic fusion between the manifest and scientific images.Integr

sperse

Husserl’s Lifeworld and the Scientific ImageIn this part of the book, I put Sellars into conversation with phenomenology. It is argued that Husserl’s ‘lifeworld’ amounts to a very detailed and refined description of what Sellars calls the manifest image of man-in-the-world, which however absolutizes the latter’s categorial structure and mislocates the role of science within it.

迎合

Evocative

沉着

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27026-0Sellars; Phenomenology; Twentieth Century Philosophy; American Philosophy; Philosophy of Science

虚构的东西

Toward the Thing-in-Itself: Sellars’ and Meillassoux’s Divergent Conception of Kantian Transcendentasimilar to Meillassoux’s own view in that they both reject the ontological import of the principle of sufficient reason and take it that worldly processes are ultimately contingent and not characterized by any causal necessity, from a more penetrating point of view, their views on these issues are in fact radically different.