找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History; Maria Cristina Marcuzzo,Ghislain Deleplace,Paolo P Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if appl

[复制链接]
查看: 31853|回复: 57
发表于 2025-3-21 18:21:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History
编辑Maria Cristina Marcuzzo,Ghislain Deleplace,Paolo P
视频video
概述Combines innovative methodological insights in economics with original studies on “big names” in the history of economic thought.Challenges the mainstream way of doing economics by broadening its scop
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought
图书封面Titlebook: New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History;  Maria Cristina Marcuzzo,Ghislain Deleplace,Paolo P Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if appl
描述This Festschrift is published in honour of Annalisa Rosselli, a political economist and historian of economic thought, whose academic activity has promoted unconventional ways of thinking throughout her career. A renowned list of scholars articulate and respond to this vision through a series of essays, leading to an advocacy of pluralism and critical thinking in political economy. .The book is split into five parts, opening with a section on new topics for the history of economic thought including new perspectives in gender studies and an illustration of the fecundity of the link with economic history. This is followed by sections that address relevant perspectives on the Classical approach to distribution and accumulation, Ricardo, interpretation of Sraffa and the legacy of Keynes..This book will appeal to students interested in reforming economics, as well as academics and economists interested in political economy and thehistory of economic thought..
出版日期Book 2020
关键词Ricardo; Sraffa; Keynes; Classical political economy; Economic and social systems; Free Market; Liquidity;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42925-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-42927-0
isbn_ebook978-3-030-42925-6Series ISSN 2662-6578 Series E-ISSN 2662-6586
issn_series 2662-6578
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History影响因子(影响力)




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History网络公开度




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History网络公开度学科排名




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History被引频次




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History被引频次学科排名




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History年度引用




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History年度引用学科排名




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History读者反馈




书目名称New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:10:47 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,mics, as well as from other approaches which tend to separate the study of economic theories from economic history. Focusing on special theories and their historical and institutional dimension, the analytical-historical approach to the HET offers the possibility to reorient the study of political economy along new promising routes.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:25:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:01:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:45:56 | 显示全部楼层
Family, Gender Inequality and Growth: History Mattersity and fertility decisions. Moreover, economic growth—hence more job opportunities for women—tends to be constrained in societies where the family still plays a strong economic role (i.e. there is a disproportionally large share of small family firms).
发表于 2025-3-22 15:18:56 | 显示全部楼层
Bentham and Ricardo’s ,-t led Ricardo to disagree with Bentham’s monetary analysis. The last .-. was also .. Bentham blamed Ricardo for confusing ‘cost’ with ‘value’ in his ., but this reflects diverging approaches between the two authors. Accordingly, the assumption of Bentham’s influence on Ricardo’s economics seems hardly defendable.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:08:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:35:29 | 显示全部楼层
Dialogues , Between Antonio Gramsci and Piero Sraffa on Ricardo, Classical Political Economy and ‘Puni’s . (2nd ed., 1931) and gave an opinion about . by Robbins, through an indirect source. About the questions raised in these books, Gramsci would have appreciated a dialogue with Sraffa, a critic of marginalism. But unfortunately it was not the case.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:31:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:07:43 | 显示全部楼层
Money, Banking and Politics in Early Nineteenth-Century Portugal at stake. The Portuguese case also enables us to better understand the rhetorical use of political economy in the course of political action, particularly in matters of a monetary and financial nature.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-12 11:11
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表