找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation; Mark‘Fossett Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2017 D

[复制链接]
查看: 22618|回复: 61
发表于 2025-3-21 17:39:34 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation
编辑Mark‘Fossett
视频video
概述This open access book introduces new perspectives for interpreting and evaluating segregation indices.Clarifies the connections between segregation and group differences in residential outcomes.Gives
丛书名称The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis
图书封面Titlebook: New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation;  Mark‘Fossett Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2017 D
描述This book is open access under a CC BY-NC 2.5 license..This book introduces new methods for measuring and analyzing residential segregation.  It begins by placing all popular segregation indices in the “difference of group means” framework wherein index scores can be obtained as simple differences of group means on individual-level residential attainments scored from area racial composition.  Drawing on the insight that in this framework index scores are additively determined by individual residential attainments, the book shows that the level of segregation in a given city can be equated to the effect of group membership (e.g., race) on individual residential attainments.  This unifies separate research traditions in the field by joining the analysis of segregation at the aggregate level with the analysis of residential attainments for individuals.  Next it shows how segregation analysis can be extended by using multivariate attainment models to assess the impact of group membership (i.e., the level of segregation for a city) while including controls for other relevant individual characteristics (e.g., income, education, language, nativity, etc.).  It then illustrates how one can
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2017
关键词Demographic techniques; Quantitative research methods; Residential segregation; Residential attainment;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41304-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-82318-8
isbn_ebook978-3-319-41304-4Series ISSN 1877-2560 Series E-ISSN 2215-1990
issn_series 1877-2560
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation网络公开度




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation被引频次




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation被引频次学科排名




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation年度引用




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation年度引用学科排名




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation读者反馈




书目名称New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:27:17 | 显示全部楼层
Aspatial and Spatial Applications of Indices of Uneven Distribution,ks, block groups, tracts) have no implications for the scores obtained. Spatial formulations would differ on this key point; namely, the spatial arrangement of units can potentially impact index scores.
发表于 2025-3-22 00:33:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:42:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:51:04 | 显示全部楼层
,Overview of the “Difference of Means” Framework,is an important new approach that brings many advantages and possibilities to segregation measurement and analysis. To make the case for this view I now provide a more detailed discussion comparing standard computing formulas with the difference of means formulas.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:08:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:05:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:05:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:08:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:37:46 | 显示全部楼层
Empirical Relationships Among Indices,e learned from considering these two situations. In addition, I use portions of the chapter to review several practical issues researchers may want to consider when using the indices in empirical studies.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 22:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表