找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Neural Machines: A Defense of Non-Representationalism in Cognitive Neuroscience; Matej Kohár Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

[复制链接]
楼主: Maculate
发表于 2025-3-25 03:33:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:08:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 14:54:31 | 显示全部楼层
Mechanistic Explanatory Texts, along the lines of Craver and Kaplan. However, I show that Craver and Kaplan’s view leads to four problems: the Contrasts in Ontology problem, the problem of Identifying Relevant Switch-Points, the problem of Single-Model Explanation and the problem of Empirical Adequacy. I show that the problems c
发表于 2025-3-25 17:02:35 | 显示全部楼层
Representations and Mechanisms Do Not Mix,and distinguishing it from person-level mental representation, I argue that a truly representational explanation requires that the content of neural representations be explanatorily relevant. I then argue that this is inconsistent with the requirements for mechanistic constitution, and consequently
发表于 2025-3-25 21:01:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 02:18:59 | 显示全部楼层
Structural Contents,itive phenomena. After introducing structural representations, I argue that while there are superficial differences in structuralist theories of representational content, the paradigm cases of structural representation are best understood if the content-determining relation is viewed liberally as si
发表于 2025-3-26 05:46:44 | 显示全部楼层
Teleosemantics,ons of cognitive phenomena. I note that most teleosemantic theories of content rely on indicator relations or structural similarity in addition to teleofunctions. As such, they inherit the issues with constitutive relevance inherent to indicator semantics and structuralist semantics. I furthermore s
发表于 2025-3-26 10:57:11 | 显示全部楼层
The Dual-Explananda Defence,ly mechanistically and must be explained representationally instead. I term this view the dual-explananda defence. I identify two types of dual explananda: (1) fittingness – the fact that particular mechanisms are well suited for particular cognitive tasks and not others; and (2) success: the fact t
发表于 2025-3-26 16:09:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 17:02:53 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusions and Future Directions,planations – for both mainstream cognitive neuroscience and for pre-existing non-representational alternatives. I argue that for mainstream cognitive neuroscience, this book has shown representations to be of little importance, and that mechanistic explanatory texts should not mention representation
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 14:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表