找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Narration as Argument; Paula Olmos Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Narratives, Narrating, Narrators.Narratives in Argu

[复制链接]
楼主: Precise
发表于 2025-3-23 10:10:48 | 显示全部楼层
Paula OlmosLebensqualität Manche Men­ schen sind allein, fühlen sich einsam und verlassen. Sie leiden unter dieser Isolation enorm. Ziel aller Therapiemaßnahmen muss stets eine Verbesserung der persönlichen Lebensqualität978-3-7091-3811-3
发表于 2025-3-23 13:56:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 21:59:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 23:13:14 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2017larities or dissimilarities, and offers diverse perspectives and conceptual tools for analyzing the narratives’ potential power for justification, explanation and persuasion. Divided into two sections, the first Part, under the title “Narratives as Sources of Knowledge and Argument”, includes five c
发表于 2025-3-24 03:31:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:04:22 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: Narratives, Narrating, Narrators,Narration as Argument from different perspectives. It tries to be, in this sense, a panoramic state-of-the art book in which the variety of approaches share nevertheless certain common principles and goals.
发表于 2025-3-24 14:03:27 | 显示全部楼层
Arguing with Storiesof a story – that is, the conclusion that the storyteller intends the hearer to draw – can be likened to the . in a legal case. Finally, we present some formal tools for modelling stories based on computational models of practical reasoning.
发表于 2025-3-24 18:39:23 | 显示全部楼层
Narrative as Argument in Atul Gawande’s “On Washing Hands” and “Letting Go”n that a skillful author can, depending on his or her overall purposes, use narrative either as a mode of argument in itself or as a means of supporting arguments made through non-narrative means—and can even use both approaches within a single piece.
发表于 2025-3-24 20:47:37 | 显示全部楼层
On Thought Experiments and Other Narratives in Scientific Argumentur analysis and our assessment of such “narrative arguments in use” would be, typically, argumentative practices themselves, in which our interpretation and our positive or negative appraisal of their relative strength will be, typically and preferably supported by reasons, and could be likewise contested.
发表于 2025-3-25 00:17:53 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-22 05:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表