找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery; An Egalitarian Appro Duff R. Waring Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004 bioethics.et

[复制链接]
查看: 54055|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 19:05:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery
副标题An Egalitarian Appro
编辑Duff R. Waring
视频video
概述One of the few books that attempts a sustained defence of random patient selection.Combines ethics and political philosophy in its novel and strict egalitarian approach to patient selection for transp
丛书名称International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
图书封面Titlebook: Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery; An Egalitarian Appro Duff R. Waring Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004 bioethics.et
描述.Bioethicists, moral philosophers and social policy analysts have long debated about how we should decide who shall be saved with scarce, lifesaving resources when not all can be saved. It is often claimed that it is fairer to save younger persons and that age is an ethically relevant consideration in such tragic decisions. Medical benefit should be maximized and final selection should aim to minimize the contaminating influence of chance. These claims are challenged by Duff R. Waring in .Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery., one of the few books that attempts a sustained defence of random patient selection. ..This book combines ethics and political philosophy in its novel and strict egalitarian approach to patient selection for transplantable organs. Waring addresses the question of whether we should choose between lives on the basis of fair chances or best outcomes. He argues that final selection criteria should be based on fair chances that equalize opportunity as opposed to best outcomes. His defence of "hardy" egalitarianism aims to show that random selection by lottery can affirm both a common humanity and the equal value of lives. The notion of patient selection by lottery
出版日期Book 2004
关键词bioethics; ethics; Ethos; morality; philosophy; political philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2973-8
isbn_softcover978-90-481-6756-2
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-2973-8Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
issn_series 1567-8008
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery网络公开度




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery被引频次




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery被引频次学科排名




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery年度引用




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery年度引用学科排名




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery读者反馈




书目名称Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:39:26 | 显示全部楼层
Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery978-1-4020-2973-8Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
发表于 2025-3-22 02:17:46 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2973-8bioethics; ethics; Ethos; morality; philosophy; political philosophy
发表于 2025-3-22 04:46:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:39:58 | 显示全部楼层
International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicinehttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/629121.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 15:36:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:54:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:35:43 | 显示全部楼层
Fair Innings and Need over a Lifetime,well-being argument.” The second version is that these age-based limits can be defended on the grounds that, insofar as possible, there should be an equal opportunity to live to the same age as others. We can refer to this version as the “equal opportunity to live to the same age as others” argument.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:02:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:23:17 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 17:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表