找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Marxism and Alternatives; Towards the Conceptu Tom Rockmore,William J. Gavin,Thomas J. Blakeley Book 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dor

[复制链接]
楼主: 街道
发表于 2025-3-26 22:46:27 | 显示全部楼层
Natural Law and the Common GoodEtienne Gilson (1884–1978) recalls the sense of strangeness produced by his first contact with Thomistic philosophy in Sebastien Reinstadler’s ... Gilson, who studied at the Sorbonne with Brunschvicg and Lévy-Bruhl, was shocked by the bad manners of Reinstadler and the Scholastics who tended to label any opinion contradicting their own as absurd.
发表于 2025-3-27 04:19:58 | 显示全部楼层
The “Predicamental” PerspectiveAs an epilogue to the neo-Thomistic theory, it is helpful to explicate some of the meta-principles at work in the preceding explanations. Something like this reflection was traditionally included in Scholastic material logic under the rubric of “ante-predicaments” — the notions needed for understanding the functioning of the predicaments.
发表于 2025-3-27 05:19:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:57:47 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8495-0Lenin; Leninism; Marx; logic; marxism
发表于 2025-3-27 17:01:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 18:39:12 | 显示全部楼层
Meta-Marxismlanation and by his commitment to the view in question. The outsider can be accused of “dogmatism” for applying something “foreign” to what was to be explained. Even the “detached” or “neutral” observer has to declare a “standard” for comparison — which would be clearly a . in the most destructive (i.e., uncritical) sense.
发表于 2025-3-28 00:10:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 05:10:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 09:13:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 11:17:15 | 显示全部楼层
Science and Progresserence among philosophies is . that one of them has complete explanations and the others do not, but rather that one recognizes that explanations are partial and the others do not. This is but to reaffirm the importance of contextualism from another point of view.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-23 19:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表