找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Marx and Laozi; A Dialectical Synthe James Chambers Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to S

[复制链接]
查看: 14359|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 17:25:17 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Marx and Laozi
副标题A Dialectical Synthe
编辑James Chambers
视频video
概述Makes a novel and unique contribution to the field of comparative philosophy of Chinese and Western philosophy.Covers a very broad range of areas of philosophical interest in Laozi, Hegel and Marx in
图书封面Titlebook: Marx and Laozi; A Dialectical Synthe James Chambers Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to S
描述.In this work the theories of Marx and Laozi are dialectically combined. The resulting synthesis is a positive materialist negation of Hegel’s idealist dialectics. Syntheses are presented for Marx and Laozi in ontology, metaphysics, epistemology, scientific method, ethics and politics: the full spectrum of their foundational principles. The book is an attempt to reconstruct a materialist interpretation of Laozi, which can be put to work for Marxist theory..
出版日期Book 2023
关键词Marx; Laozi; Hegel; Naturalism; Materialism; Idealism; Praxis
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40981-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-40983-7
isbn_ebook978-3-031-40981-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Marx and Laozi影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Marx and Laozi影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Marx and Laozi网络公开度




书目名称Marx and Laozi网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Marx and Laozi被引频次




书目名称Marx and Laozi被引频次学科排名




书目名称Marx and Laozi年度引用




书目名称Marx and Laozi年度引用学科排名




书目名称Marx and Laozi读者反馈




书目名称Marx and Laozi读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:45:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:33:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:11:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:42:51 | 显示全部楼层
Social Ontology of Materialism and Idealism argue Smith’s arguments against the sovereignty of the finite thesis interpretation are unconvincing. This involves a brief account of Adorno’s materialist refutation of Hegel’s concrete universal. The thesis will go on to employ this account in its interpretation of Marx’s materialist concrete universal in ..
发表于 2025-3-22 13:03:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:56:44 | 显示全部楼层
Hegel’s Interpretation of Laozicords Laozi the lowest status: a preliminary stage before the beginning of philosophy proper. Then it argues that Hegel has got Laozi wrong, introducing complexities to Laozi’s position which Hegel’s interpretation has overlooked.
发表于 2025-3-22 21:43:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:35:58 | 显示全部楼层
Marx and Laozi’s Ethical Naturalismshumanity and all things. This ethical argument is anti-essentialist. However, it will be shown that this argument is consistent with a neglected tendency immanent in Aristotle’s essentialist ethics, his idea of the metabolism.
发表于 2025-3-23 05:33:47 | 显示全部楼层
Reading Strategies for Hegel, Marx, and Laoziworks are historicist, essentialist, and humanist and operate within the science of concepts (in a qualified sense), Laozi is anti-historicist, anti-essentialist, anti-humanist, and anti-conceptualist and operates within aesthetic comportment to practice.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 18:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表