找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Marx and Laozi; A Dialectical Synthe James Chambers Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to S

[复制链接]
楼主: Definite
发表于 2025-3-25 05:17:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:43:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 12:36:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 19:31:02 | 显示全部楼层
Reading Strategies for Hegel, Marx, and Laozind Laozi). It will be explained that the reading strategy for Laozi is directly opposed to that of Marx because of their divergent approaches: Marx’s works are historicist, essentialist, and humanist and operate within the science of concepts (in a qualified sense), Laozi is anti-historicist, anti-e
发表于 2025-3-25 21:20:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 04:08:01 | 显示全部楼层
Hegel’s Metaphilosophy of Idealism account of Hegel’s idealism is essential for this as the controversy that will unfold between Hegel and Laozi in the next chapter will mainly concern idealism. The chapter surveys recent literature on Hegel’s Idealist conception of philosophy to give a clear explanation of his idealism. It will be
发表于 2025-3-26 06:49:58 | 显示全部楼层
Hegel’s Interpretation of Laozienuine dialogue between the two, dialogue is circumscribed by Laozi’s rejection of Hegel’s idealist conception of philosophy. The chapter begins by going over some hermeneutic issues involved in Hegel’s own reading of Laozi, situating it in Hegel’s cultural/historical context and Hegel’s idealist/co
发表于 2025-3-26 10:27:29 | 显示全部楼层
An Anti-conceptualist Reconstruction of Laozihy and how. The interpretation of Hegel’s idealism explained in previous chapters will be used to show that Laozi’s approach represents a way of thinking philosophically which Hegel’s philosophy, despite some points of contact, can neither accommodate nor refute. A Laozi will be constructed who is n
发表于 2025-3-26 14:04:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 20:10:24 | 显示全部楼层
Praxis: Scientific Discursive Employment of Conceptsach’s criticism to scientifically employ Hegel’s logic. Hegel’s hypostatization of the concept was scientifically progressive in that it led to the science of concepts. Marx will be read as correcting Hegel’s hypostatization by giving Hegel’s abstract concepts the content of concrete history. Marx w
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 18:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表