Titlebook: Magna Carta and New Zealand; History, Politics an Stephen Winter,Chris Jones Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2017

fodlder

陈腐思想

Magna Carta and Memorialization: The Perils of Historical Anniversariesvery little to say about the political circumstances of the thirteenth century. This chapter examines the gap between the medieval Magna Carta and its modern legacy to reflect on the methodological pitfalls of commemorating anniversaries and on the curious cultural imperative of big round numbers.

Cumbersome

Myths and History: The Treaty of Waitangi as “The Magna Charta of New Zealand” a symbol to be associated with the Treaty. In this paper Williams will argue that there are good reasons, though not based on the actual history of Magna Carta or the Treaty of Waitangi, to associate these foundational documents together as important elements of an Aotearoa New Zealand national mythology.

URN

BLANC

The Politics of Magna Carta and the Ancient Constitution in New Zealand, 1642–,.1860identity and a political weapon in divisive issues involving settlers, government and Māori. The chapter traces populist appeals to history and English birthright in controversies over land ownership, representation and liberty under law in the first two decades after the Treaty.

Minatory

The Myth of the “Māori Magna Carta” people. This chapter also proposes that Māori need to be wary of attempts to align the Treaty of Waitangi with any constitutional argument. The emergence of the Rūnanga system in the 1860s is used to provide insight into how the relationship between the Crown and tribes should have operated.

旧病复发

剧毒

obstinate

Mana and Magna Carta: Locating New Legacies for a Medieval Charter in Post-colonial Aotearoa New Zeas the original Charter’s approach to Welsh grievances to recast one of New Zealand’s founding constitutional documents as a model for legal pluralism and argues this offers a useful counterpoint to the nineteenth-century conceptions of sovereignty that continue to dominate modern debate.

judiciousness