Titlebook: Magna Carta and New Zealand; History, Politics an Stephen Winter,Chris Jones Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2017

关心

易受刺激

Magna Carta and Memorialization: The Perils of Historical Anniversariesthe Treaty and of Auckland city (1840) also received attention. Why is it that we continue to use such moments of chronological coincidence to consider the meaning of past events? Recent triumphalism concerning Magna Carta may allow us to feel good about ourselves and our legal heritage, but it has

encyclopedia

遵循的规范

Magna Carta and a Paradox of Authorityhistory of its reception, it is argued, is at the same time a history of what has justified its authority. It may have been the “Bible of the Constitution” and a “foundational” document, but like any other authority, its title to be respected has been contingent on continually-changing assumptions a

Agility

Symbol and Myth: Magna Carta in Legal and Public Discourse About Law and Rights in New Zealand, 1840hich Magna Carta was discussed then looks at the apparent place of Magna Carta in public discourse about law and individual rights in New Zealand, as reflected in articles and letters in the newspapers. Magna Carta was frequently invoked as a guarantor of individual rights, especially in the 1920s w

新星

HARD

The Myth of the “Māori Magna Carta”his chapter examines the myth of the “Māori Magna Carta” and highlights why the Treaty should not be considered New Zealand’s Magna Carta. That King John’s ancestors claimed rights through conquest is a fundamental difference: the Treaty of Waitangi was not a Treaty between the Crown and a conquered

讲个故事逗他

表主动

Homocystinuria