设为首页收藏本站
开启辅助访问 切换到窄版

 找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步，快速开始

扫一扫，访问微社区

  • ALL
  • Journals
  • Books

派博传思国际中心 »期刊书目

› BOOKS
› BOOKS with Alphabet L (La, Lb,Lc, Ld, Le…... )

123456下一页
返回列表

Titlebook: Logic, Truth and the Modalities; From a Phenomenologi J. N. Mohanty Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 Edmund Husserl

[复制链接]
查看: 33921|回复: 54
发表于 2025-3-21 19:11:34 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities
副标题From a Phenomenologi
编辑J. N. Mohanty
视频video
丛书名称Synthese Library
图书封面Titlebook: Logic, Truth and the Modalities; From a Phenomenologi J. N. Mohanty Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 Edmund Husserl
描述This volume is a collection of my essays on philosophy of logic from a phenomenological perspective. They deal with the four kinds of logic I have been concerned with: formal logic, transcendental logic, speculative logic and hermeneutic logic. Of these, only one, the essay on Hegel, touches upon ‘speculative logic‘, and two, those on Heidegger and Konig, are concerned with hermeneutic logic. The rest have to do with Husser! and Kant. I have not tried to show that the four logics are compatible. I believe, they are--once they are given a phenomenological underpinning. The original plan of writing an Introduction in which the issues would have to be formulated, developed and brought together, was abandoned in favor of writing an Introductory Essay on the ‘origin‘- in the phenomenological sense -of logic. J.N.M. Philadelphia INTRODUCTION: THE ORIGIN OF LOGIC The question of the origin of logic may pertain to historical origin (When did it all begin? Who founded the science of logic?), psychological origin (When, in the course of its mental development, does the child learn logical operations?), cultural origin (What cultural - theological, metaphysical and linguisti- conditions make
出版日期Book 1999
关键词Edmund Husserl; Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel; Immanuel Kant; Martin Heidegger; concept; experience; logic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2113-4
isbn_softcover978-90-481-5163-9
isbn_ebook978-94-017-2113-4Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities网络公开度




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities被引频次




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities年度引用




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities读者反馈




书目名称Logic, Truth and the Modalities读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
1.jpg
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
2.jpg
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
3.jpg
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
4.jpg
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
5.jpg
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用户组没有投票权限
赎罪
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-21 20:43:35 | 显示全部楼层
LINES
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 02:31:17 | 显示全部楼层
,Husserl’s Thoughts on the Foundation of Logic,nces — formal logic and mathematics, formal syntax and semantics — has been taken to be an ally of a positivistic, formalistic and (narrowly) analytic philosophical perspective. I believe that upon further questioning, this alleged alliance breaks down, and the prima facie neutrality of the conecrn
遭遇
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 08:05:54 | 显示全部楼层
promote
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 11:27:27 | 显示全部楼层
nullify
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 15:05:32 | 显示全部楼层
Heidegger on Logic,is no justification for expecting of any great philosopher whatsoever that he should have views, and reasonably plausible views, about the nature of logic or on specific themes belonging to the domain of logic. A moral philosopher may totally bypass any concern with logic, without detriment to his t
我就不公正
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 17:36:00 | 显示全部楼层
Pruritus
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 23:59:10 | 显示全部楼层
COM
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 04:10:02 | 显示全部楼层
,Husserl’s ‘Logic of Truth’,and much discussed in the secondary literature,. and may well have exercised some influence on the actual development of modern logic. But very little has been done to explain what he could have meant by ‘logic of truth’ — much less to further develop that idea. I want this paper to be a contributio
不真
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 07:00:12 | 显示全部楼层
陈列
回复

举报

下一页 »
123456下一页
返回列表
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 07:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表