找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic, Language, Information, and Computation; 20th International W Leonid Libkin,Ulrich Kohlenbach,Ruy Queiroz Conference proceedings 2013

[复制链接]
楼主: interminable
发表于 2025-3-25 07:13:04 | 显示全部楼层
Logic and Agent Programming Languages,Agent programming languages based on the Belief, Desire and Intentions (BDI) framework present some interesting challenges for logicians. While BDI logics have been studied extensively, problems related to belief update and analysis of plans in BDI agent programming languages have received less attention.
发表于 2025-3-25 08:53:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 15:06:47 | 显示全部楼层
Conference proceedings 2013together with 6 invited lectures were carefully reviewed and selected from 30 submissions. The scope of the workshop spans the theoretical and practical aspects of formal logic, computing and programming theory, and natural language and reasoning.          .
发表于 2025-3-25 18:23:39 | 显示全部楼层
0302-9743 ation of Logic, Language and Information this book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Logic, Language, Information and Communication, WoLLIC 2013, held in Darmstadt, Germany, in August 2013. The 17 contributed papers presented together with 6 invited lectures were carefully
发表于 2025-3-25 22:19:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 02:09:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 07:25:01 | 显示全部楼层
Linear Time Proof Verification on N-Graphs: A Graph Theoretic Approach,ties from trees to check the connectivity of every switching (a concept similar to D-R graph). Since the soundness criterion in proof graphs is analogous to Danos-Regnier’s procedure, the algorithm can also be extended to check proofs in the multiplicative linear logic without units (MLL.) with linear time complexity.
发表于 2025-3-26 09:42:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 15:13:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 18:29:22 | 显示全部楼层
The Same, Similar, or Just Completely Different? Equivalence for Argumentation in Light of Logic,the underlying argumentative structure that it is taken to represent. One such question, which we study in this paper, is the question of when two arguments should be considered ., a question which has been surprisingly controversial, and which also, as we will demonstrate, gives rise to interesting technical results and future challenges.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 21:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表