找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking; Michał Araszkiewicz,Krzysztof Płeszka Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

[复制链接]
楼主: arouse
发表于 2025-3-26 21:57:23 | 显示全部楼层
Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking978-3-319-19575-9Series ISSN 2213-2813 Series E-ISSN 2213-2856
发表于 2025-3-27 01:55:42 | 显示全部楼层
Negation in Legislationtegorical negation, conditional denial, and denied conditional, and establishing when two norms may be regarded as conflicting. In its second part, the paper analyzes the possible relations negation has with two important legal phenomena, such as derogation, and defeasibility.
发表于 2025-3-27 07:10:35 | 显示全部楼层
Conflict of Legal Norms: Definition and Varietiesmple a promise, a conveyance, or a judicial decision). The analysis encompasses conflicts between deontic norms relating to obligations and permissions, on one hand, and norms relating to legal power, on the other. The analysis is applicable both to conflicts within a national legal system and to su
发表于 2025-3-27 10:08:58 | 显示全部楼层
The Theories of Statutory Construction and Legislative Process in American Jurisprudencets, while a purposivist judge will want to know the statutory purpose. Finally, theory impacts the legislative process, from drafting to enactment; thus, this chapter will examine the role legislative history has had both now and in the past.
发表于 2025-3-27 16:23:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 21:28:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 22:03:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 03:07:10 | 显示全部楼层
Logic Oriented Methods for Structuring in the Context of Lawmakingsed to shape and improve legislative rationality. In the neighbourhood of logic there are further methods which can find application in structuring legislative texts. We propose to supplement legislative documents ex ante with explicit logic-oriented information which is relevant to ontologies, thes
发表于 2025-3-28 07:35:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 13:00:18 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 23:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表