Titlebook: Logic and the Nature of Reality; Louis O. Kattsoff Book 1956 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1956 knowledge.logic.metaphysics

probiotic

书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality网络公开度




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality被引频次




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality年度引用




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality读者反馈




书目名称Logic and the Nature of Reality读者反馈学科排名

不可思议

Language and Metaphysics,itable return to metaphysical problems. In this chapter I propose to examine the relation between metaphysics and language. In a sense much of what I will say in this chapter has been implied in the preceding one. But I want to emphasize certain points and to clarify some others before I undertake t

泥沼

可用

NOCT

On What There is,en the object-domain of metaphysics is not unique and it is better to turn the whole matter over to the empirical sciences. Were this so those who have urged that this be done because all metaphysicsl statements are either empirical and as a consequence belong to scientific languages or emotive and

analogous

How We Know the Essence of What There is, consider some of the objections to such knowledge. These objections may be directed either at the necessity for such a knowledge or at the claim that there are propositions which are the result of such knowledge. If we use the somewhat ambiguous words ‘intuitive’ and ‘intuition’ the objections take

humectant

The Verification of Metaphysical Statements,onditions can we say that S in M is verified? It is important to note that I am not asking under what conditions we can say that S is verified in M, but under what conditions S which occurs in M may be said to be verified. The difference between ‘S is verified in M’ and ‘S in M is verified’ should b

Corroborate

The Veridicality of Eidetic Intuition,as been intuited by eidetic intuition, what, if anything, can be done about it? Is it possible to bring about agreement or to clarify the source of disagreement ? This implies that the claim to eidetic intuition is not in itself a proof that eidetic intuition did as a matter of fact occur.

Agnosia

眨眼

Negation, Conjunction, and Events, also be conceded that we never find unrelated events. So although the ultimate metaphysical unit is symbolized by the expression ‘fx’, we never do find ‘fx’ alone and we should be tempted to conclude that we never accost a simple event. From the point of view of experience of whatever kind, we must