找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Literature and Personal Values; Patrick Grant Book 1992 Patrick Grant 1992 English literature.literary theory.literature

[复制链接]
查看: 18080|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 19:35:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Literature and Personal Values
编辑Patrick Grant
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Literature and Personal Values;  Patrick Grant Book 1992 Patrick Grant 1992 English literature.literary theory.literature
出版日期Book 1992
关键词English literature; literary theory; literature
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22116-5
isbn_softcover978-1-349-22118-9
isbn_ebook978-1-349-22116-5
copyrightPatrick Grant 1992
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Literature and Personal Values影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Literature and Personal Values影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Literature and Personal Values网络公开度




书目名称Literature and Personal Values网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Literature and Personal Values被引频次




书目名称Literature and Personal Values被引频次学科排名




书目名称Literature and Personal Values年度引用




书目名称Literature and Personal Values年度引用学科排名




书目名称Literature and Personal Values读者反馈




书目名称Literature and Personal Values读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:10:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:54:45 | 显示全部楼层
Imagination,ordant, asymmetrical, rent even by the desire driving us to quench ourselves, thus, in the other. Ambiguity, oscillation and tension characterise imagination’s pursuit, relieved now and then by a sense of fusion but deflected always in a nemesis of misrecognition re-iterating the incessantly exigent ‘Who am I?’
发表于 2025-3-22 07:14:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:24:00 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/587241.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 14:12:41 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22116-5English literature; literary theory; literature
发表于 2025-3-22 19:44:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:49:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:36:48 | 显示全部楼层
Validation,meneutics often take issue. But does it then make sense to say that a work of literature is testable? And if literature is not testable in any sense whatever, then does it not provide a merely private experience that falls short of being personal in the sense in which I have been using the term? Eve
发表于 2025-3-23 08:45:23 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 01:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表