Titlebook: Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature; New Interdisciplinar Andrea Selleri,Philip Gaydon Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable

Espionage

书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature网络公开度




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature被引频次




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature被引频次学科排名




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature年度引用




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature年度引用学科排名




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature读者反馈




书目名称Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature读者反馈学科排名

鞭打

Analytic Philosophy of Literature: Problems and Prospectse. After discussing its history and characteristics, it examines certain alleged weaknesses of the analytic approach, such as its neglect of the empirical and historical. Finally, it considers the prospects of the analytic enterprise and suggests how it can best contribute to our understanding of literature.

Comedienne

Commentary

Poetic Utterances: Attuning Poetry and Philosophym, leaving us in doubt whether its various features are indeed exemplified. This chapter aims to give us the resources to practise attunement on whole poems, thus shedding light on the way that phrases of this type fit into broader patterns.

GAVEL

Literary Examples in Analytic Aesthetics: The Claim of the Empiricalbeen vitiated by an insufficient concern with the particularities of the literary works used as examples. There follows an outline of some ways in which a fuller acquaintance with literary studies may help aestheticians strike a better balance between clear-headedness about the general and fidelity to the empirical.

神刊

What Do We Do with Words? Framing What Is at Stake in Dealing with Literaturenot as ‘literature’, and that, if there is something to be acknowledged as peculiar of literature, it is its capacity (1) to stage everything that philosophers and theorists have to explain; and (2) to escape any act of definition and of categorisation.

Minikin

Anal-Canal

消耗

模仿

Criticism, Philosophy and the Differend that distinguishes them from one another on a range of issues. Jean-François Lyotard defines ‘the differend’ as a divide that cannot be bridged, or a difference that cannot be resolved for lack of a rule that ultimately binds both parties. Do criticism and philosophy face a differend, or can they combine to answer shared questions?