Titlebook: Legal Socialization; A Study of Norms and Ellen S. Cohn,Susan O. White Book 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990 Interaktion.Sozialisati

有害处

deforestation

Scope of the Studyrned environment. That linkage is the focus of this study. Our three-stage model translated the basic argument into specific variables and the discussion of the two leading theories of legal socialization suggested possible relationships among these variables. This chapter describes our research des

消息灵通

DECRY

Testing Competing Hypothesescialization effects than were produced through the natural socialization process. In order to better understand these varying effects, we tested competing hypotheses drawn from the two leading theories of legal socialization. According to legal development theory (Levine & Tapp, 1977; Tapp & Kohlber

AXIS

Effects of the Interactioners, 1985; Akers et al., 1979; Aronfreed, 1968, 1969; Bandura, 1969a, 1969b, 1976) in order to determine the relative influence of internal and external factors in legal socialization. We found that one’s level of legal reasoning was a better predictor of attitudes toward rules and rule-violating be

平

Legal Reasoning and Behaviors: The Mediating Modele in legal socialization attitudes (normative status of the ruleviolating behaviors and enforcement status of the rules). Cognitive developmental theory (Levine & Tapp, 1977; Tapp & Kohlberg, 1977) and social learning theory (Akers, 1985; Akers et al., 1979; Bandura, 1969a, 1969b, 1977) offer differ

你不公正

vitreous-humor

朝圣者

符合你规定

Ellen S. Cohn PhD,Susan O. White PhDhave awarded the IEA annually since 1995 in France, and in Germany since 1997. In the course of this effort, we have analyzed questionnaires from hundreds of plants, visited 100 of them, and given prizes to 30.978-3-642-05537-9978-3-540-24758-6