找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law; Fábio P. Shecaira Book 20131st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

[复制链接]
查看: 34344|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 19:56:13 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law
编辑Fábio P. Shecaira
视频video
概述Deals with conceptual, empirical and normative questions about the use of legal scholarship by judges.Adopts a Hartian philosophical perspective and, in so doing, attempts to illustrate the usefulness
丛书名称SpringerBriefs in Law
图书封面Titlebook: Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law;  Fábio P. Shecaira Book 20131st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus
描述.This book is about the use of legal scholarship by judges. It discusses the possibility that legal scholarship may function as a genuine source of law in modern municipal legal systems. The book advances a number of claims, some conceptual, some empirical, some normative. The major conceptual claims are found in Chapters 2 and 3, where a general account of the notion of a source of law is provided. Roughly, sources of law are documents or practices (e.g. statutes, judicial decisions, official customs) from which norms can be derived that function as sources of content-independent reasons for judges to decide legal cases one way or another. The relevant notion of content-independence is derived (with qualifications) from H.L.A. Hart’s jurisprudence. Indeed, the book’s analysis of the concept of a source of law relies at various points on Hartian insights about law and legal reasoning. Chapter 4 argues that legal scholarship – or, more precisely, a particular type of legal scholarship that might be described as standard or doctrinal – can be, and indeed is, used as a source of law in modern legal systems. The conclusion that legal scholarship is used as a source of law (and thus as
出版日期Book 20131st edition
关键词Authorativeness of sources of law; Challenging the Association; Content Independent Reason; Decline of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00428-0
isbn_softcover978-3-319-00427-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-00428-0Series ISSN 2192-855X Series E-ISSN 2192-8568
issn_series 2192-855X
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law网络公开度




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law被引频次




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law年度引用




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law读者反馈




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:20:53 | 显示全部楼层
2192-855X tive and, in so doing, attempts to illustrate the usefulness.This book is about the use of legal scholarship by judges. It discusses the possibility that legal scholarship may function as a genuine source of law in modern municipal legal systems. The book advances a number of claims, some conceptual
发表于 2025-3-22 00:45:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:53:41 | 显示全部楼层
What is a Source of Law?,es with a caveat regarding some of the perils involved in taking judicial discourse at face value. To treat something as a source of law is to systematically approach it with a certain normative attitude. One expects to see that attitude manifested in public judicial discourse; but judicial discourse can also mislead if read superficially.
发表于 2025-3-22 12:12:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:51:19 | 显示全部楼层
Formalism and the Use of Legal Scholarship,dge’s last resort. Scholarship may be used to mitigate the impression that a judge is exercising discretion or relying on personal judgment. It follows that formalist judges have little reason to avoid scholarship; indeed they can use it (and indeed have used it) in their favor.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:36:13 | 显示全部楼层
Normative Questions,use it. Examples are given of judicial decisions in which judges cite to scholarship in a way that suggests that it is serving to mitigate discretion when in fact it is not. The point is that this type of judicial decision exhibits an unjustified lack of sincerity.
发表于 2025-3-23 00:19:03 | 显示全部楼层
ompanies to reduce enterprise output rate or failure. The purpose of this research is to help explain how the government through professional associations may increase the know how of entrepreneurs or managers of new enterprises. Of the cases studied we have learned that starting a business is a dif
发表于 2025-3-23 02:03:39 | 显示全部楼层
Fábio Shecairaarrollo de la Ingeniería de Organización/ Industrial Engineers Association (ADINGOR). The aim of CIO is to establish a forum for the open and free exchange of ideas, opinions and academic experiences about research, technology transfer or successful business experiences in the field of Industrial En
发表于 2025-3-23 09:28:06 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 05:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表