书目名称 | Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law | 编辑 | Fábio P. Shecaira | 视频video | | 概述 | Deals with conceptual, empirical and normative questions about the use of legal scholarship by judges.Adopts a Hartian philosophical perspective and, in so doing, attempts to illustrate the usefulness | 丛书名称 | SpringerBriefs in Law | 图书封面 |  | 描述 | .This book is about the use of legal scholarship by judges. It discusses the possibility that legal scholarship may function as a genuine source of law in modern municipal legal systems. The book advances a number of claims, some conceptual, some empirical, some normative. The major conceptual claims are found in Chapters 2 and 3, where a general account of the notion of a source of law is provided. Roughly, sources of law are documents or practices (e.g. statutes, judicial decisions, official customs) from which norms can be derived that function as sources of content-independent reasons for judges to decide legal cases one way or another. The relevant notion of content-independence is derived (with qualifications) from H.L.A. Hart’s jurisprudence. Indeed, the book’s analysis of the concept of a source of law relies at various points on Hartian insights about law and legal reasoning. Chapter 4 argues that legal scholarship – or, more precisely, a particular type of legal scholarship that might be described as standard or doctrinal – can be, and indeed is, used as a source of law in modern legal systems. The conclusion that legal scholarship is used as a source of law (and thus as | 出版日期 | Book 20131st edition | 关键词 | Authorativeness of sources of law; Challenging the Association; Content Independent Reason; Decline of | 版次 | 1 | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00428-0 | isbn_softcover | 978-3-319-00427-3 | isbn_ebook | 978-3-319-00428-0Series ISSN 2192-855X Series E-ISSN 2192-8568 | issn_series | 2192-855X | copyright | The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl |
The information of publication is updating
|
|