| 书目名称 | Law and Semiotics | | 副标题 | Volume 1 | | 编辑 | Roberta Kevelson | | 视频video | | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | However, it became apparent shortly after the establishing of the Center that not only were all methods of legal semiotics not Peircean in origin, but were in their respective foundational assumptions not likely to be compatible with Peirce‘s semiotics without some radical, transforming development of the idea, ‘legal semiotics‘. It was clear that if one would intend to be faithful to Peircean semiotics then holding a fixed notion of what an idea of Peircean semiotics of law means would be a violation of the spirit of Peirce‘s thought; this above all emphasizes the growth and development of initiative ideas and also the stricture that all leading principles must be subject to revision. Even the idea of Peircean semiotics, as leading principle, must itself be an open idea, the meaning of which must be transformable through the process of defining it. A metasemiotics view of a semiotics of law must leave open the possibility for revision of the leading principle of the term, "legal semiotics. " Therefore, if legal semiotics is an idea which accumulates and evolves its meaning in the very process of self-examination, then a process of investigating law investigates itself as well in a | | 出版日期 | Book 1987 | | 关键词 | Interpretation; Legal Semiotics; Nation; communication; democracy; education; law and semiotics; natural la | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0959-8 | | isbn_softcover | 978-1-4612-8265-5 | | isbn_ebook | 978-1-4613-0959-8 | | copyright | Plenum Press, New York 1987 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 19:45:22
