找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Law and Opera; Filippo Annunziata,Giorgio Fabio Colombo Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Law.Opera.Intellectual propert

[复制链接]
查看: 36147|回复: 53
发表于 2025-3-21 19:19:34 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Law and Opera
编辑Filippo Annunziata,Giorgio Fabio Colombo
视频video
概述Entertaining for lawyers and opera fans alike.Offers a comprehensive perspective on the topic.Includes approaches from jurists, philosophers, musicologists and historians
图书封面Titlebook: Law and Opera;  Filippo Annunziata,Giorgio Fabio Colombo Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Law.Opera.Intellectual propert
描述.This book explores the various connections between Law and Opera, providing a comprehensive, multinational, and multidisciplinary (with approaches from jurists, philosophers, musicologist, historians) resource on the subject. Further, it makes a valuable contribution to studies on law and the humanities. While, for example, the relationship between law and literature has been extensively researched, the relationship between Law and Opera remains largely overlooked. The book approaches the topic from three perspectives in three main sections: Law in Opera, Law on Opera, and Law around Opera..
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Law; Opera; Intellectual property; Law and literature; Music
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68649-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-09845-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-68649-3
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Law and Opera影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Law and Opera影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Law and Opera网络公开度




书目名称Law and Opera网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Law and Opera被引频次




书目名称Law and Opera被引频次学科排名




书目名称Law and Opera年度引用




书目名称Law and Opera年度引用学科排名




书目名称Law and Opera读者反馈




书目名称Law and Opera读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:15:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:02:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:08:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:41:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:08:17 | 显示全部楼层
Scalia/Ginsburg: The Rhythm of the US Federal Supreme Courtduet “We are different, we are one”. It enlightens that despite their different interpretation of written texts and ideological and intellectual disagreements they were united by their reverence towards the institution and especially the Constitution..However this debate in the Supreme Court is also
发表于 2025-3-22 18:21:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:28:27 | 显示全部楼层
. The Tragic Conflicts of the Judge in ,cedures, and goes as far as sacrificing his paternal feelings on the altar of reason of State..The proposed interpretation in this work, along with the examination of the problematic dimension of the relationship between truth and legal truth, revolves around the resolution of the split between natu
发表于 2025-3-23 04:51:11 | 显示全部楼层
“That May Be Japanese Law … but Not in My Country!” Marriage, Divorce, and Private International Lawen for granted, but a legal, technical analysis leads to a different conclusion..This paper investigates in detail the legal aspects of Madama Butterfly, in light of the applicable law in Japan in 1904: in particular, the Civil Code of 1898 (.), the Japanese Code of Private International Law (.) and
发表于 2025-3-23 07:56:51 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-26 19:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表