Titlebook: Law and Economics of Justice; Efficiency, Reciproc Klaus Mathis,Avishalom Tor Conference proceedings 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

Petechiae

The Institutional Turn in Corporate Governance Towards Addressing Corporate Externalities and Publicg third parties—to other legal domains, such as tort law and employment law. However, the most critical private-ordering mechanisms of corporate governance, including executive compensation and takeover discipline, depend critically on market prices, which may be incomplete if externalities are pres

显赫的人

intolerance

态学

The Relevance of Law and Economics for Practical Reasoninghen used to make a choice in the real world) are based on the idea that there would exist a scientific “right” way to approach legal issues and decision making. According to this perspective, all issues (legal, political or scientific) should be addressed using the same method and the same scientifi

有效

Efficiency and International Human Rights Law: Some Preliminary Thoughts. In this instance, the paper explores how lessons may be shared between law and economics on the one hand and international human rights law on the other. The paper addresses the question of the suitability and benefits to international human rights law of the law and economics methodology. This is

引导

muscle-fibers

charisma

多骨

The Consumer Welfare Standard, Consumer Sovereignty, and Reciprocitytion standard; 2) this notion of allocative efficiency clearly fits better with EU antitrust and consumer law than the traditional total welfare hypothesis. The second claim is presented as a good reason for taking this notion of allocative efficiency in the economic approach to law seriously. This

流逝

Hierarchy, Efficiency, and Meritying to justify this practice, the notions of desert and merit have historically played a major role. However, in recent times, most philosophers have been deeply sceptical about these notions, instead attempting to justify hierarchies by referring to considerations of efficiency. I argue that this