找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Language and Professional Identity; Aspects of Collabora Keith Richards Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Li

[复制链接]
楼主: negation
发表于 2025-3-23 10:05:16 | 显示全部楼层
The Interactional Dynamic: Stories from the Back Region,eir engagement with the mysteries of their profession. In this chapter I hope to show, through an exploration of these teachers’ tales, how the mystery of . work sets them apart from other groups, and how their modes of sharing represent both a commitment to the seriousness of their profession and a
发表于 2025-3-23 14:51:15 | 显示全部楼层
Seeing Things Our Way: The Establishment of Common Perspectives,: the difference between dynamic collaboration and pallid conformity depends on it. So while argument in the Pen and IEC is similarly managed, the slightly ambiguous position of the head of DOTS generates perturbations in its negotiation there, and while the academics and research scientists are hap
发表于 2025-3-23 19:20:50 | 显示全部楼层
Us and Them: Constructing the Other,trary.’ This is an extreme reflection of the necessary truth that the existence of groups is dependent at least to some degree on the extent to which they can be distinguished from other groups and collections of individuals. So far I have concentrated on interactional features that characterise my
发表于 2025-3-23 23:03:45 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,bstance to their achievements. Yet what is professionally achieved is also linguistically achieved and the identities that emerge from engagements with daily business are as much linguistic as professional. Although my exploration of this fundamental relationship has established no definitive charac
发表于 2025-3-24 02:25:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:04:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 14:33:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 18:09:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:14:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 02:15:38 | 显示全部楼层
Staying Onside: The Negotiation of Argument,ngineer collaborative positioning which reorients individual differences within a broader common purpose. I will suggest that this process depends on an orientation where notions of winning or losing an argument have no valency and that, instead, arguments are constructed for the purposes of . those involved.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-29 01:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表