找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Landscapes and Narratives of PhD by Publication; Demystifying student Sin Wang Chong,Neil Johnson Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

[复制链接]
楼主: Jurisdiction
发表于 2025-3-23 11:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
Evolving Identities: A Collaborative Autoethnography in Supervising and Being Supervised by Colleagu we draw upon a collaborative autoethnography by three colleagues, one who occupied the role of Doctoral Candidate and two who occupied the role of Supervisor, in order to interrogate the notion of fixed identities within both roles. Drawing upon the Deleuzian concept of ‘becoming’, and Braidotti’s
发表于 2025-3-23 16:21:10 | 显示全部楼层
The PhD by Publication as Preparation for Work in the ‘Performative University’ my value as a doctoral student in relation to performance metrics such as quantifiable research outputs and citation counts. Now, after 3 years working in an academic position, I reflect upon how the PhD by Publication prepared me to negotiate an academic world where performance is intensely scruti
发表于 2025-3-23 20:47:55 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2022route to a PhD by publication, and the current lack of published advice, Chongand Johnson have drawn together accounts by supervisors, student and graduates of their experiences of PhDs by publication, and what they learnt that will make the journey easier for others. Containing advice about how to
发表于 2025-3-24 00:15:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 03:46:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 06:39:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 10:47:53 | 显示全部楼层
Retrospective PhD by Publication in the UK: A Rapid Review on Educational Research Commentariescation practitioners who have substantial teaching and research experiences. Researchers have argued that a Retrospective PhD by Publication prepares candidates to excel in academia in terms of research capacity although some underscore the lack of support for candidates pursuing this doctoral route
发表于 2025-3-24 18:15:51 | 显示全部楼层
Metadiscourse in the Retrospective PhD by Publication: More or Less the Same? importance of metadiscourse in both the traditional monograph PhD theses and the academic research article, regardless of academic discipline. There has been some initial research to understand the particular genre requirements of the Retrospective PhD by Publication, but little work has been done
发表于 2025-3-24 21:22:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 23:38:45 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 05:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表