找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Knowledge First?; Aidan McGlynn Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 Philosophy.epistemology.phil

[复制链接]
查看: 55172|回复: 43
发表于 2025-3-21 19:53:11 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Knowledge First?
编辑Aidan McGlynn
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/544/543923/543923.mp4
丛书名称Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: Knowledge First?;  Aidan McGlynn Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 Philosophy.epistemology.phil
描述According to a long tradition, questions about the nature of knowledge are to be answered by analyzing it as a species of true belief. In light of the apparent failure of this approach, knowledge first philosophy takes knowledge as the starting point in epistemology. Knowledge First? offers the first overview of this approach.
出版日期Book 2014
关键词Philosophy; epistemology; philosophy of language; philosophy of mind; knowledge; belief; justification; evi
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026460
isbn_softcover978-1-349-43920-1
isbn_ebook978-1-137-02646-0Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
issn_series 2946-2851
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Knowledge First?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Knowledge First?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Knowledge First?网络公开度




书目名称Knowledge First?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Knowledge First?被引频次




书目名称Knowledge First?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Knowledge First?年度引用




书目名称Knowledge First?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Knowledge First?读者反馈




书目名称Knowledge First?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:41:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:06:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:39:06 | 显示全部楼层
Luminosity about which one cannot possibly be in error. But the idea that some suitably qualified version of this claim must be right — that our judgments about what’s going on in our own minds are typically immediate, authoritative, and (within certain limits) comprehensive — has proved robust.
发表于 2025-3-22 11:35:56 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: Lessons from Gettiericient. This triggered 50 years of ingenious, sophisticated, and often ridiculously complicated attempts to identify the mystery factor X that would result in knowledge when added to justified true belief (or alternatively, when replacing justification). However, these attempts proved to be plagued
发表于 2025-3-22 13:43:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:36:34 | 显示全部楼层
Justificatione to be explained shortly.. Fourth, Reynolds has proposed that justification is the appearance of knowledge. Williamson’s equation of one’s evidence with one’s knowledge deserves close scrutiny, and it receives it in the next chapter. In this chapter, I’ll focus on the other three knowledge first ap
发表于 2025-3-23 00:07:06 | 显示全部楼层
Actioncused on this issue, and it would be impossible to do it justice here. In not engaging with this topic on this occasion, I do not mean to slight its interest or significance; for a helpful and recent overview, see Fantl and McGrath (2011).
发表于 2025-3-23 03:01:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:28:40 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-9 22:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表