Titlebook: Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks; Roger Howard Mitchell Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995 Petrogenesis.che

巡洋

书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks网络公开度




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks被引频次




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks被引频次学科排名




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks年度引用




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks年度引用学科排名




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks读者反馈




书目名称Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks读者反馈学科排名

专横

Suppository

Kimberlites and Orangeites,een termed “micaceous kimberlites” or “group II kimberlites.” The discussion, in conjunction with detailed mineralogical studies described in Chapter 2, will demonstrate conclusively that kimberlites and orangeites cannot be derived from the same parental magma and thus are not genetically related.

手势

态度暖昧

心胸开阔

事先无准备

Inflammation

Petrogenesis of Orangeites and Kimberlites,ing from a stance of promoting their own particular bias, be it geophysical, experimental, geochemical, or tectonic, have devised contradictory models for a given magma type. Once introduced, such models are commonly promoted by their originators without impartial reflection on all aspects of the problem or consideration of competing hypotheses.

DAMP

Kimberlites and Orangeites,group I kimberlites, with those of the group of diamond-bearing rocks which, in this work, are termed “orangeites.” The latter rocks have previously been termed “micaceous kimberlites” or “group II kimberlites.” The discussion, in conjunction with detailed mineralogical studies described in Chapter

爆炸

Mineralogy of Orangeites,s, previous studies did not attempt to delineate mineral assemblages and compositional trends which could be used to discriminate between each group of rocks. This chapter is based upon many new analyses of minerals in archetypal kimberlites and orangeites. The study of the latter is far from defini