Titlebook: Kant and Kierkegaard on Religion; D. Z. Phillips (Danforth Professor of Philosophy o Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

发酵剂

Gratuitous

杀人

Limerick

完整

可触知

figure

仲裁者

Kant and Kierkegaard on the Possibility of Metaphysicsphers share is a distaste for metaphysics. Though it may well be true that each group of philosophers has a very different conception of metaphysics, and even that each in its positive thrust exemplifies what the other wishes to stigmatize as metaphysics, it remains true that for each ‘metaphysics’

diathermy

Kant and Kierkegaard on the Possibility of Metaphysics — a Reply to Professor EvansKierkegaard’s? My answer to each is negative. As to the first, philosophical realism is not so much mistaken as confused, as is, therefore, its negation in anti-realism. In such philosophical theories language ‘goes on holiday’, is removed from the contexts of its application where it has sense. Wha

nonradioactive

Faith Not without Reason: Kant, Kierkegaard and Religious Belieftion theologians adopted the slogan ‘Faith not without works’. In like manner, in order to avoid the extremes of the standard dichotomy between reason and faith, especially as expressed in the traditional interpretations of Kant and Kierkegaard, I here choose the title ‘Faith not without reason’. In