Titlebook: Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement; Colin Farrelly Book 2007 Colin Farrelly 2007 basic income.constitution.cooperation.democracy.

自恋

歪曲道理

Colin Farrellyance of the non-idealizing approach, inviting the reader to .Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. is a collection of feminist essays that self-consciously develop non-idealizing approaches to either ethics or social and political philosophy (or both). Charac

鞭打

Colin Farrellyroduction of normativity by political action. Feminism, though, does not illuminate this aspect of itself because feminists tend to describe feminist political action with a moral rather than political vocabulary. Such a vocabulary succeeds in capturing just one aspect of feminism – the centering of

开始没有

Colin Farrellyeminists from various disciplines have developed arguments to support the redistribution of the work of care through institutional mechanisms. I discuss the limits of such distribution under the conditions of theories that do not idealize human agents as independent beings. People’s reliance on care

CROW

Colin Farrelly scrutinises the impact of the Europeanisation process on women’s development. Building on the findings of seven empirical chapters touching upon both the adoption and application of the EU’s rules, we offer a condensed summary of the extensive lack of feminist thinking and framing in the EU’s appro

暂停,间歇

Colin Farrellystanding of the EU.Provides a moral and ethical philosophica.‘Bridging European and gender studies, this volume deserves a great welcome to the literature. It not only offers a feminist reading of Europeanisation in general, but also discusses the process of Europeanisation and de-Europeanisation of

地名词典

scrutinises the impact of the Europeanisation process on women’s development. Building on the findings of seven empirical chapters touching upon both the adoption and application of the EU’s rules, we offer a condensed summary of the extensive lack of feminist thinking and framing in the EU’s appro

coalition

The Virtues of Fair Social Cooperation,ustice. These include Rawls’s theory of ‘justice as fairness’, Ronald Dworkin’s version of ‘luck egalitarianism’, and both right (e.g. Robert Nozick) and left (e.g. Michael Otsuka, Philippe Van Parijs) variants of libertarianism. This book has two primary goals. The first goal is the negative aim of

苦恼

The Simplifying Assumptions of Rawlsian Justice,emporary theories of justice, including John Rawls’s theory of justice as fairness, Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory of justice, Ronald Dworkin’s defence of luck egalitarianism, as well as recent versions of left-libertarianism (Otsuka [2003] and Van Parijs [1995]). While many of the specific conc

agitate

The Cost-Blind Approach to Rights (Continued...),front with libertarians like Robert Nozick. The rise of rights-based theories of justice in contemporary debates was due largely to what many saw as a deficiency with utilitarianism. A public philosophy premised on the idea of maximizing the greatest happiness of the greatest numbers could not, crit