找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement; Colin Farrelly Book 2007 Colin Farrelly 2007 basic income.constitution.cooperation.democracy.

[复制链接]
楼主: Arthur
发表于 2025-3-28 15:23:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 18:47:47 | 显示全部楼层
Should the Left Embrace Left-Libertarianism?,y offer a plethora of different prescriptions for remedying these injustices. In this chapter I critically assess another principled account of justice that functions at the level of ideal theory - .Left-libertarian theories of justice hold that agents are full self-owners and that natural resources
发表于 2025-3-28 23:15:49 | 显示全部楼层
Neutrality and Toleration,seriously interfere with conduct one finds objectionable’ (1996, p. 28).. Liberals champion toleration as one of the main virtues of a just society. The tolerant society is one which protects a diverse array of fundamental freedoms ranging from freedom of conscience and religion to freedom of expres
发表于 2025-3-29 04:16:45 | 显示全部楼层
,The ‘Dialogical Model’ of Judicial Review,at the principles of justice are. These include the assumption that society is a . and a society of . members. Let us briefly revisit these concerns by comparing how Rawls’s simplifying assumptions skew the kinds of concerns that I highlighted in the beginning of Chapter 1. Recall the six scenarios
发表于 2025-3-29 07:40:23 | 显示全部楼层
Deliberative Democracy,ia . and a democratic process rather than through deception, manipulation or the appeal to violence. Civility inspires a moralized conception of democracy - it moves us to search for a reasoned, negotiated compromise on how we are to live together as a society. But civility is also attuned to real-l
发表于 2025-3-29 13:06:11 | 显示全部楼层
Concluding Thoughts and Review, judgement of, the . of one’s society. What is the benchmark by which we can both judge the severity of our individual and collective failings and, at the same time, invoke to help inspire and direct us towards a more fair and humane society? Unfortunately a good deal of contemporary political philo
发表于 2025-3-29 16:21:48 | 显示全部楼层
Concluding Thoughts and Review,sophy, which is dominated by the principled paradigm of ideal theory, misplaces or misconstrues what this benchmark is. The appropriate metric for measuring the justness of our society is, I have argued, a . metric. One that emphasizes the virtues of fair social cooperation - toleration, civility and fairness.
发表于 2025-3-29 20:30:47 | 显示全部楼层
The Cost-Blind Approach to Rights (Continued...),h a violation is justified. This is the line of argument that Rawls utilizes against utilitarianism. Justice denies, argues Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, that the loss of freedom for some is made right by a greater good shared by others.
发表于 2025-3-30 03:14:33 | 显示全部楼层
beralism‘. He critically assesses the main contemporary theories of justice and tackles a number of applied topics, ranging from constitutional design and free speech to welfare reform and economic incentives.978-1-349-51650-6978-0-230-59687-0
发表于 2025-3-30 04:17:35 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 20:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表