找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism; Robert C. Robinson Book 2014 Robert C. Robinson 2014 Luck Egalitarianism.Liberalism.J

[复制链接]
查看: 41672|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 16:30:57 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism
编辑Robert C. Robinson
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism;  Robert C. Robinson Book 2014 Robert C. Robinson 2014 Luck Egalitarianism.Liberalism.J
描述This text explores the place to locate the cut between those inequalities for which it is fair to hold one responsible, and those for which it is not. The argument traces a thread of intellectual history, identifying a rejection of strong property rights which we inherit from Locke, and find in contemporary defenders of entitlements such as Nozick.
出版日期Book 2014
关键词Luck Egalitarianism; Liberalism; Justice; Responsibility; Equality; Rawls; Cohen; Marx; Mill; history; history
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137381248
isbn_ebook978-1-137-38124-8
copyrightRobert C. Robinson 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism网络公开度




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism被引频次




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism年度引用




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism读者反馈




书目名称Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:30:28 | 显示全部楼层
Robert C. Robinson 2014
发表于 2025-3-22 02:07:52 | 显示全部楼层
Can a Well-Ordered Society Respect Liberal Property Rights?,itarian principles defended in the first two chapters, can we respect inequality in wealth and income? I hold those liberal principles up to Marxist scrutiny, and I argue that it is possible to respect Rawls’ legitimate expectations while undermining Marx’s two most pressing concerns about liberal property—for example, alienation and exploitation.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:36:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:25:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:25:52 | 显示全部楼层
Justice and Responsibility—Sensitive Egalitarianism
发表于 2025-3-22 18:45:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:10:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:53:43 | 显示全部楼层
Robert C. Robinson preventative strategies for UTIs and represents a timely and valuable resource for all practising and trainee medical professionals who encounter these patients in their practice. .978-3-030-27908-0978-3-030-27909-7Series ISSN 2199-6652 Series E-ISSN 2199-6660
发表于 2025-3-23 08:13:47 | 显示全部楼层
Robert C. Robinsonent instruction. Toileting programs (e.g., habit training and prompted voiding [PV]) are used for more care-dependent persons. The International Consultation on Incontinence has published recommendations from evidence-based research for conservative treatments. These are outlined in Table 1. This ch
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 08:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表