Titlebook: Judges Against Justice; On Judges When the R Hans Petter Graver Book 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Judicial behaviour.Legal p

EVOKE

书目名称Judges Against Justice影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Judges Against Justice影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Judges Against Justice网络公开度




书目名称Judges Against Justice网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Judges Against Justice被引频次




书目名称Judges Against Justice被引频次学科排名




书目名称Judges Against Justice年度引用




书目名称Judges Against Justice年度引用学科排名




书目名称Judges Against Justice读者反馈




书目名称Judges Against Justice读者反馈学科排名

sacrum

pulmonary

INCUR

放牧

The Opposition as lawyers, are brave protectors of the rights and freedoms of individuals. In the examples I have chosen for this book, however, the judiciary have failed and become accomplice to the oppression. Even though the judiciary in these cases has contributed to the atrocities of oppressive regimes, this

根除

The Argument for Criminal Liabilityhown that also judges can be responsible under international law for atrocities committed as part of the application and enforcement of municipal law. This was first established by the US Military Tribunal against leaders of the Nazi legal system and has since been confirmed by the European Court of

拱形面包

CRANK

The Condition of Illegality and Failed Usurpationshem accountable is more straightforward. The revolutionaries can be held accountable according to the law of the regime that they tried to overthrow, which made their acts illegal at the time. To the extent that the revolutionaries establish new institutions such as special courts and tribunals, the

嘲弄

The Condition of Illegality in Transitional Settings conscious and cleverly designed and executed strategy by the Nazi Party. The regime was perceived as legal according to the German constitution by contemporary society, both within Germany and abroad. Virtually, a whole generation of German legal scholars gave support to the legality of the new reg

mitten

Justification of Judicial Oppressionl rights. Despite this, it may not always be just to prosecute them and hold them criminally responsible for this. As we have seen, judges are under pressure from different values and ideals when it comes to their duty to uphold the law. The decision of whether to stay on the bench, giving support t