找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration; Flavio Fontenelle Loque Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

[复制链接]
查看: 15564|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 18:19:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration
编辑Flavio Fontenelle Loque
视频video
概述The first book to deal extensively with the development of Locke’s arguments for toleration.First to analyse the Essay on Human Understanding through the relation between toleration and so-called ethi
丛书名称International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idées
图书封面Titlebook: John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration;  Flavio Fontenelle Loque Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus
描述.This book offers a detailed analysis of John Locke’s case for toleration and proposes an interpretation that shows the links between his political reasoning and his reflection on the ethics of belief. Locke is concerned with toleration not only when he discusses the ends of the Commonwealth, but also when he assesses the duties of private persons regarding the search for truth. The purpose of this book is to shed light on both of these branches, which have not been sufficiently explored in other studies on Locke..With particular attention to the notions of charity, obstinacy, fallibility, reciprocity and distinction between belief and knowledge, the author proposes a reading of the .Epistola de Tolerantia., an extensive discussion of the controversy between Locke and Jonas Proast, as well as an examination of .An Essay Concerning Human Understanding., in order to establish the meaning and interconnection of Locke’s arguments in favour of toleration..
出版日期Book 2022
关键词Toleration; Epistola de Tolerantia; John Locke; Imposition; Locke and Proast
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90363-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-90365-7
isbn_ebook978-3-030-90363-3Series ISSN 0066-6610 Series E-ISSN 2215-0307
issn_series 0066-6610
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration影响因子(影响力)




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration网络公开度




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration网络公开度学科排名




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration被引频次




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration被引频次学科排名




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration年度引用




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration年度引用学科排名




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration读者反馈




书目名称John Locke and the Grounds for Toleration读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:51:56 | 显示全部楼层
International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idéeshttp://image.papertrans.cn/j/image/501099.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 00:33:00 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-030-90365-7The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
发表于 2025-3-22 05:30:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:56:44 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90363-3Toleration; Epistola de Tolerantia; John Locke; Imposition; Locke and Proast
发表于 2025-3-22 15:54:18 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,This chapter reiterates the main topics developed in the book. It summarises the relationship between Locke’s main arguments for toleration and restates the relevance of assessing them taking into account the vertical and horizontal dimensions of toleration.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:41:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:58:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:39:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:36:25 | 显示全部楼层
The Locke and Proast Controversy,he present chapter demonstrates that the controversy has significant conceptual developments when compared to the .. The interpretation proposed here also aims to highlight the importance of the notion of obstinacy as a justification for intolerance, and to single out the more evident appropriations of Augustine.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 07:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表