找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: John Dewey; Liberty and the Peda John Baldacchino Book 2014 The Author(s) 2014 John Dewey.democracy education.disposition.education experie

[复制链接]
楼主: Nixon
发表于 2025-3-26 22:10:15 | 显示全部楼层
,What’s Deweyan?,hy, and how education, liberty and disposition converge in a . with Dewey’s work. As the complexity of a . argument unfolds, it becomes clear that Dewey cannot be anything but Deweyan because this compels everyone to recognize one fundamental measure by which we can communicate: that of a social way
发表于 2025-3-27 03:23:03 | 显示全部楼层
,Liberty’s Practice, one of the staunchest critics of neo-liberalism. In this chapter readers are invited to discuss what does . mean today; how do historical contexts and . help us understand the crises that we face; and how does Dewey reposition philosophy within a dispositional context of “edification”. In his book
发表于 2025-3-27 06:13:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 09:38:28 | 显示全部楼层
Knower Makers,anical imperatives of reason. Dewey shows that freedom is socially bound and it cannot be reduced to the simplistic negation of obstacles or limitations. Likewise, knowledge belongs to the actuality of human experience and the entirety of what it comes to represent for us. If knowledge came flat-pac
发表于 2025-3-27 14:47:22 | 显示全部楼层
Growing Socially,ng as a form of linear or incremental growth. Instead, he attributes growth to immaturity and (inter)dependence—as a relationship between immaturity, dependence and plasticity. Plasticity is the ability to learn from experience and to “develop dispositions.” Plasticity and disposition are concepts t
发表于 2025-3-27 20:37:51 | 显示全部楼层
,Education’s Art,y and education cannot be categorized as a . as found in other progressive and liberal pedagogical experiments in America and Europe. In Dewey’s pedagogical works, such as ., one finds a distinction between his care for certain daily practices (such as gardening, cooking, carpentry, and other manual
发表于 2025-3-28 00:09:51 | 显示全部楼层
Schooled Quandaries,the outcome of neoliberal models that are now widely adopted across the world on the assumption that they sustain a fair form of meritocracy, reveals that such schools fail to deliver their educational promise and remain intrinsically undemocratic. The discourse and practice of meritocracy could foo
发表于 2025-3-28 02:45:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 07:52:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 12:25:01 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 21:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表