找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Joel on Software; And on Diverse and O Joel Spolsky Book 2004 Joel Spolsky 2004 .NET.Chef.Open Source.computer science.design.language.prog

[复制链接]
查看: 26153|回复: 69
发表于 2025-3-21 17:09:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Joel on Software
副标题And on Diverse and O
编辑Joel Spolsky
视频video
概述Covers three years of the best essays.Ranges from the technical to humorous essays.Authored by one of the most popular programmers
图书封面Titlebook: Joel on Software; And on Diverse and O Joel Spolsky Book 2004 Joel Spolsky 2004 .NET.Chef.Open Source.computer science.design.language.prog
描述.Joel Spolsky. began his legendary web log, www.joelonsoftware.com, in March 2000, in order to offer insights for improving the world of programming. Spolsky based these observations on years of personal experience...The result just a handful of years later? Spolsky‘s technical knowledge, caustic wit, and extraordinary writing skills have earned him status as a programming guru! His blog has become renowned throughout the programming worldnow linked to more than 600 websites and translated into over 30 languages...Joel on Software .covers every conceivable aspect of software programming—from the best way to write code, to the best way to design an office in which to write code! All programmers, all people who want to enhance their knowledge of programmers, and all who are trying to manage programmers will surely relate to Joel‘s musings..
出版日期Book 2004
关键词; NET; Chef; Open Source; computer science; design; language; programming; software
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0753-5
isbn_softcover978-1-59059-389-9
isbn_ebook978-1-4302-0753-5
copyrightJoel Spolsky 2004
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Joel on Software影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Joel on Software影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Joel on Software网络公开度




书目名称Joel on Software网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Joel on Software被引频次




书目名称Joel on Software被引频次学科排名




书目名称Joel on Software年度引用




书目名称Joel on Software年度引用学科排名




书目名称Joel on Software读者反馈




书目名称Joel on Software读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:48:12 | 显示全部楼层
The Joel Test: 12 Steps to Better Codehat stuff. So I’ve come up with my own, highly irresponsible, sloppy test to rate the quality of a software team. The great part about it is that it takes about three minutes. With all the time you save, you can go to medical school.
发表于 2025-3-22 02:31:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层
Five Worlds In the first room, everybody dealt with dough problems all day. Dough got stuck in the machines, on your hands, in your hair, on your shoes, and everybody carried a little paint scraper to clean up dough jams. In the second room, everybody dealt with crumb problems all day. Crumbs got stuck in the
发表于 2025-3-22 08:47:51 | 显示全部楼层
Paper Prototyping of interns “whip up a prototype” suitable for usability testing, using the cutting-edge Visual Basic 1.0. Building the prototype took all summer, because it had to duplicate so much of Excel’s real functionality or you couldn’t do a real usability test.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:15:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:57:59 | 显示全部楼层
Craftsmanshipoftware factories” that could churn out high-quality code on an assembly line. It didn’t make any sense then and it doesn’t make sense now. Shoving a lot of programmers into a room and lining them up in neat rows did not really help get the bug counts down.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:16:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:38:51 | 显示全部楼层
, we both agreed on certain fundamental points. (1) Both of us rejected the doctrine, enunciated by Gilbert Harman [Harman 1965], that . forms of nondemonstrative inference fall under the rubric of Inference to the Best Explanation. (2) We agreed that the Hypothetico-Deductive method is fatally flaw
发表于 2025-3-23 05:36:05 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 14:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表