Titlebook: Irish Women Writers and the Modern Short Story; Elke D‘hoker Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author (s) 2016 Irish literat

frugal

graphy

Elke D’hokeriology™. series format, chapters include introductions to their respective topics, lists of the necessary materials and reagents, step-by-step, readily reproducible protocols, and978-1-4939-6287-7978-1-62703-293-3Series ISSN 1064-3745 Series E-ISSN 1940-6029

OTTER

Crepitus

Elke D’hokeriology™. series format, chapters include introductions to their respective topics, lists of the necessary materials and reagents, step-by-step, readily reproducible protocols, and978-1-4939-6287-7978-1-62703-293-3Series ISSN 1064-3745 Series E-ISSN 1940-6029

SPER

树上结蜜糖

development of the Irish short story, highlighting both the lines of influence that connect these writers and the specific use each individual author makes of the short story form. .978-3-319-80770-6978-3-319-30288-1

ICLE

Introduction,ad of investing in the Romantic myth of the outsider-as-hero, women writers have more often sought to raise questions of relations, family and community in their short fiction. A sustained attention to those thematic concerns, in tandem with an exploration of the formal characteristics of their shor

炸坏

Mothers of the Irish Short Story: George Egerton and Somerville and Ross,s chapter shows how these writers all foreground social conceptualizations of the self: Somerville and Ross by depicting individuals as part of a community (albeit one ambivalently defined in terms of class, gender and nationality); Egerton by modifying the Nietzschean conceptualization of the free

GEST

Houses and Homes in the Short Stories of Elizabeth Bowen and Maeve Brennan,alization of female identity and relations than that offered by the middle-class home and family. This thematic and ideological discussion is supported by a close scrutiny of the specific narrative structures and stylistic characteristics of the short fiction of both writers. In the case of Bowen, t

白杨鱼

,Mary Lavin’s Relational Selves,n of the individual’s relation to society. If Lavin’s stories show how the differences between people often make relationships degenerative and destructive, they also argue that it is this very difference that necessitates relations: only the plurality of human bonds can make up for the inevitable s