Titlebook: Intimacy and Power; The Dynamics of Pers Derek Layder Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009 dynamic

四目在模仿

The Nature of Modern Intimacy,of the ‘pure relationship’ (Giddens 1992, Beck and Beck-Gernsheim 1995). On the basis of evidence presented in Chapter 2 modern couple intimacy is not uniform and unitary and thus the pure relationship overlooks its finer gradations and complexities. The typology of couple intimacy in Chapter 2 depi

sacrum

Hemoptysis

群居动物

责任

ions in self-disclosure, intimacy games and relationship habits. It describes how the dynamics of power and control in relationships give rise either to mutual satisfaction or to the unraveling of intimacy.978-0-230-24514-3

难解

The Varieties of Couple Intimacy,irically based studies (see Jamieson 1998 for an overview of such studies). A critical evaluation of these alternative accounts, and the evidence on which they are based, suggests that contemporary intimacy can be best understood in relation to a varied spectrum of types of personal relationship routinely found in couples and friends.

补助

巡回

noxious

Gender, Intimacy Styles and Skills,dity of claims that men and women differ in their capacities for intimacy. The view adopted here is that such claims are questionable on various grounds and I outline two strands of argument in support of this position.

作茧自缚

Intimacy, Power and Social Domains,y. In fact, structural, systemic or collective dimensions of power play a crucial role in so far as intimate (interpersonal) relationships are formed at the centre of a maelstrom of social domain and power influences.