Titlebook: Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing; Erica Burleigh Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014 America

热情美女

书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing网络公开度




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing被引频次




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing被引频次学科排名




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing年度引用




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing年度引用学科排名




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing读者反馈




书目名称Intimacy and Family in Early American Writing读者反馈学科排名

CAMP

勤勉

Range-Of-Motion

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137404084America; bibliography; genre; interdependence; landscape; love; novel; oral discourse; slavery; William Henry

约会

Inordinate

ow the trope of the family recurred to produce contradictory images - both intimately familiar and frighteningly alienating - through which Americans responded to upheavals in their cultural landscape.978-1-349-48718-9978-1-137-40408-4

BOOM

Introduction: Intimacy, Integrity, Interdependence,too much family feeling: incest recurs as both an implicit and an explicit element of many early American writings, from the satirical . (1787) to Charles Brockden Brown’s Gothic . (1798) to William Hill Brown’s sentimental . (1807) to Rowson’s equally florid sequel, . (1828).

阶层

Discursive Intimacy,ry. Understanding how noninstrumental (or not primarily instrumental) relationships were figured makes clear the ways in which later eighteenth-century American writers both repudiated and repurposed different languages of union.

面包屑

Introduction: Intimacy, Integrity, Interdependence,orn or die around the same time that their mothers (themselves usually seduced, unwed, and abandoned) expire. This macabre narrative consistency—found in texts like Susanna Rowson’s . (1791), Hannah Webster Foster’s . (1797), and P. D. Manvil’s . (1807)—might indicate that early American writers wer

Visual-Field

Discursive Intimacy,y seem (to put it charitably) counterintuitive. Without this background, however, the discussion that follows would be missing a crucial antecedent: how people thought about relationships between people that were not familial—nor national, nor economic, nor political, nor even necessarily emotionall