找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Interprofessional issues in community and primary health care; Patricia Owens (Director of CAIPE),John Carrier (S Textbook 1995Latest edit

[复制链接]
楼主: Lincoln
发表于 2025-3-25 05:27:19 | 显示全部楼层
onal groups. Doctors, nurses and social workers are increasingly taking roles as managers with financial responsibility for services. The varying backgrounds of education and socialisation of managers and different professional groups creates barriers to mutual understanding and to effective and eff
发表于 2025-3-25 09:52:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 15:27:06 | 显示全部楼层
Child protectionand the establishment of measures to promote such co-operation are outlined in detail. The roles, attitudes and constraints experienced by the different professionals involved are analysed and illustrated by the use of case studies.
发表于 2025-3-25 18:27:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 22:25:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 01:34:01 | 显示全部楼层
Textbook 1995Latest editionuse of lack of collaboration. This text will contribute to the knowledge of inter-professional relationships and can be used as a basic guide to the issues involved, the services that require a multidisciplinary approach, and the strategies for working together.
发表于 2025-3-26 04:59:13 | 显示全部楼层
fail because of lack of collaboration. This text will contribute to the knowledge of inter-professional relationships and can be used as a basic guide to the issues involved, the services that require a multidisciplinary approach, and the strategies for working together.978-0-333-59565-7
发表于 2025-3-26 10:00:19 | 显示全部楼层
Professionalism and interprofessionalism in health and community care: some theoretical issueson to public policy which advocates a market in health and social care and a greater emphasis on voluntarism and consumerism. The authors suggest that these changes may lead inevitably to a process of deprofessionalisation.
发表于 2025-3-26 15:08:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 18:52:39 | 显示全部楼层
Ethical and resource issues in health and social care utilitarian and individual philosophical approaches to resource allocation are at the heart of ethical debates. The author examines the complexities of meaning and perception that underlie these issues.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 05:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表