找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy; Sandra Lapointe,Christopher Pincock Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

[复制链接]
楼主: incoherent
发表于 2025-3-26 23:07:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 05:11:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 09:10:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:25:11 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction, inspired by recent work of Normore and Panaccio, provides a better account of the methodological pluralism exhibited in much of the best scholarship on the history of philosophy. The authors go on to consider the different tasks that fall under this pluralistic approach. This chapter concludes with
发表于 2025-3-27 15:56:18 | 显示全部楼层
The Rise of ‘Analytic Philosophy’: When and How Did People Begin Calling Themselves ‘Analytic Philosler, more manageable set of interrelated questions: First, when and how did people begin using the label ‘analytic philosophy’? Second, how did those who used this label understand it? Third, why did many philosophers we today classify as analytic initially resist being grouped together under the si
发表于 2025-3-27 19:53:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 01:24:11 | 显示全部楼层
The History and Prehistory of Natural-Language Semanticswhich I mean the period when the formal methods of semantics developed for the purposes of studying formal languages. Due to their primarily mathematical and philosophical aims, the key prehistoric figures—I focus on Frege, Carnap, and Tarski—idealized away from aspects of sentence meaning other tha
发表于 2025-3-28 04:57:43 | 显示全部楼层
Russell on Acquaintance with Spatial Properties: The Significance of Jamestual purpose in “constructing” physical bodies out of sense-data is instead to show that psychology and physics are consistent. But how seriously engaged was Russell with actual psychology? I show that OKEW makes some non-trivial assumptions about the character of visual space, and I argue that he d
发表于 2025-3-28 08:04:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 11:15:01 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 06:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表