Titlebook: In the Realm of Legal and Moral Philosophy; Critical Encounters Matthew H. Kramer Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

费解

What Good is Truth?,lues, the good of knowledge lends itself to a special argument — an argument directed against people who assail the ranking of knowledge as a good.. Finnis maintains that anyone who seriously denies the goodness of truth or knowledge must contradict herself flagrantly in the act of putting forth her

丑恶

How Not to Oppugn Consequentialism,s who evaluate each action by reference to the consequences or states of affairs which the action brings about;. on the latter side are philosophers who evaluate each action by reference to its accordance or disaccordance with entitlements and obligations that obtain irrespective of the consequences

OMIT

Justice as Constancy,of those phenomena. Not least important is the distinction between the substantive aspects and the procedural or formal aspects of law and justice. Claims about the moral import of law will prove to be untenable if they give insufficient heed to the form/substance gap. My current discussion, which i

Enrage

,Questions Raised and Questions Begged: Some Doubts about Ronald Dworkin’s Approach to Law-and-Econoctices of interpretation, and he likewise submits that the Anglo-American legal tradition should be seen as fundamentally shaped by the ideal of equality. Nowhere does his combination of views emerge more piquantly than in his book’s eighth chapter, entitled ‘The Common Law’. Dworkin there grants th

idiopathic

Fantasy

Agronomy

Ptosis

,Of Aristotle and Ice Cream Cones: Reflections on Jules Coleman’s Theory of Corrective justice,ere has been a good deal of overlapping and repetition among those writings, there have also occurred some major shifts in Coleman’s positions. One of the aims of the present essay is to determine whether the transformations in Coleman’s thinking have been entirely salutary.

Carbon-Monoxide

,Getting the Rabbit Out of the Hat: A Critique of Anthony Kronman’s Theory of Contract,hilosophy of private law’.. Kronman’s article has received a great deal of attention on both sides of the Atlantic, and it has helped to sharpen the debate between libertarianism and other forms of liberalism. In the present essay, we shall seek to expose two major weaknesses in Kronman’s arguments

模范