Titlebook: Imagination and Critique; Two Rival Versions o James R. L. Noland Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 John Rawls.Karl Marx.

projectile

James R.L. Nolandinology and location) traditionally involved, who was selected, and what issues they had to watch out for/contend with to complete their role. The chapter uses interviews with vice chancellors from England, and university presidents from Canada, to determine what the role involves in the twenty-firs

织物

James R.L. Noland and research, compared to what their role entails. The chapter explores how deans see their role primarily as managers tasked with reaching KPIs set by those above them, and also contending with the personal issues that come with running a team. Indeed, as majority of deans see their work as being

Etymology

媒介

capital fetishism, Bourdieu is a strong weapon against rational choice theory. And he convincingly criticizes Marxism for its inability to overcome basic theoretical oppositions like idealism vs. materialism. But Bourdieu’s capital theory also contributes to the proliferation of capital concepts in

凹槽

Introduction,ilosophy that was originally conceived not in a philosophy seminar but in a school of public policy. As a philosopher learning about the study of public policy formation, I was frequently struck by what I perceived to be two very different sets of assumptions and methods at work. I found these assum

Atmosphere

The Story of the Federal Income Tax: A Case Study,re became the 36th state to approve its ratification thereby making it the law of the land. This amendment, which gave the federal government the power to tax income, was the culmination of almost 50 years of debate about the desirability and legality of such taxation.

喷油井

Vico and the Faculty of Imagination,ac Newton’s . (1687), which offered a systematic explanation of the physical world, and established “Rules for Reasoning in Philosophy”, there was a demand for a similar accounting of a science of humanity [63, p. 921]. Although Vico is notoriously obscure – he is neither as organized nor as precise

Magnificent

,Marx’s Critique of History, studied scientifically. In order to grasp the nature of Marx’s method one has to extract his thoughts on the matter from his various works and piece them together, drawing further on his practice of this science to form a coherent picture [20, p. 106]. This piecing together is the project of this c

十字架

Addressing Marx Through Rawls, Vico’s version of historical inquiry over that of Marx. Ultimately, and put simply, the basis for this contention is that the conception of reason found in Vico is more plausible than that found in Marx. I begin my argument by pointing out some significant weaknesses in Marx’s account of the facult

躲债